HSBC Holdings PLCLSE: HSBA

Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 September 2026

· Issued by HSBC Holdings PLC

Summary by 6ix AI

HSBC Holdings plc published its quarterly Pillar 3 regulatory disclosures on capital, risk and liquidity at September 30, 2026. They show common equity tier 1 (CET1, its core capital) of $128.1 billion and a CET1 ratio of 13.9%, compared with 14.1% at June 30, 2026.

Key details

  • HSBC says the CET1 ratio fell because of higher risk-weighted assets, a lower fair value of hold-to-collect-and-sell debt instruments due to higher yields, and the share buy-back announced at its interim results. Regulatory profits net of dividends partly offset these.
  • Risk-weighted assets, used to set capital needs, rose by $16.0 billion to $922.4 billion from June 30, 2026. HSBC says this was primarily driven by asset size movements of $18.7 billion and a $5.9 billion rise from redeveloped probability of default models.
  • The leverage ratio was 4.9%, unchanged from June 30, 2026. The liquidity coverage ratio (liquid assets against 30-day stress outflows) was 132%, or $175 billion above the requirement, for the 12 months to September 30, 2026. The net stable funding ratio was 139%.
  • The Board approved a third interim dividend of $0.10 per share. HSBC completed its $1bn share buy-back on September 28, 2026.
  • In the third quarter of 2026 HSBC completed the sale of its operations in Uruguay. It announced sales of HSBC Life Singapore, its Australian home and personal loan portfolio and its retail banking business in Egypt, and began a strategic review of its retail and domestic-focused small and mid-sized corporate banking in Türkiye.

What’s still pending

  • HSBC intends to start a share buy-back of up to $1bn, which it expects to complete by its 2026 full-year results announcement.
  • Completion of the announced disposals and related actions remains subject to relevant regulatory and other approvals.
  • Based on its latest modelling, HSBC expects the UK's Basel 3.1 capital rules, scheduled to take effect January 1, 2027, to benefit its CET1 ratio by approximately 40-50 basis points (0.40 to 0.50 percentage points). The final impact depends on factors including model and data refinements, portfolio size and composition, and supervisory permissions.
  • HSBC intends to continue to manage its CET1 ratio within its medium-term target operating range of 14%-14.5%.

6ix AI wrote this summary from the release below and checked it against the release.

HSBC Holdings plc

Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 September 2026 Contents

2 Disclosures and Governance

3 Highlights

4 Key metrics

6 Capital

6 Approach and policy

6 Own funds

7 Risk-weighted assets

7 Credit risk, including securitisation

7 Counterparty credit risk, including settlement risk

7 Market risk

7 Operational risk

9 Leverage

10 Liquidity

11 Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities

13 Abbreviations

14 Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements

16 Contacts

Unless the context requires otherwise, 'HSBC Holdings' means HSBC Holdings plc and 'HSBC', the 'Group', 'we', 'us' and 'our' refer to HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiaries. Within this document the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is referred to as 'Hong Kong'. When used in the terms 'shareholders' equity' and 'total shareholders' equity', 'shareholders' means holders of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares and those preference shares and capital securities issued by HSBC Holdings classified as equity. The abbreviations '$m', '$bn' and '$tn' represent millions, billions (thousands of millions) and trillions (millions of millions) of US dollars respectively. This document should be read in conjunction with the Earnings Release 3Q26, which has been published on our website at https://www.hsbc.com/investors.

Tables

4 Key metrics (KM1)

6 Own funds disclosure

7 Overview of risk-weighted exposure amounts (OV1)

8 RWA flow statements of credit risk exposures under the IRB approach (CR8)

8 RWA flow statements of CCR exposures under IMM (CCR7)

8 RWA flow statements of market risk exposures under IMA (MR2-B)

9 Leverage ratio common disclosure (UK LR2-LRCom)

11 Quantitative information of LCR (UK LIQ1)

12 Key metrics of the European resolution group (KM2)

12 Key metrics of the Asian resolution group (KM2)

12 Key metrics of the US resolution group (KM2)

Disclosures and Governance Regulatory framework for disclosure

Our Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 September 2026 comprise both quantitative and qualitative information required under Pillar 3. These disclosures are made in accordance with the United Kingdom ('UK') Prudential Regulation Authority ('PRA') Rulebook Disclosure (Capital Requirements Regulation). They are supplemented by specific additional requirements of the PRA and discretionary disclosures on our part.

We are supervised on a consolidated basis in the UK by the PRA, which receives information on the capital and liquidity adequacy of, and sets capital and liquidity requirements for, the Group as a whole. Individual banking subsidiaries are directly regulated by their local banking supervisors, who set and monitor their local capital and liquidity adequacy requirements. In most jurisdictions, non-banking financial subsidiaries are also subject to the supervision and capital and liquidity requirements of local regulatory authorities.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ('Basel') III framework is structured around three 'pillars', with the Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements and the Pillar 2 supervisory review process complemented by the Pillar 3 market discipline. The aim of Pillar 3 is to produce disclosures that allow market participants to assess the scope of application by banks of the Basel framework and the rules in their jurisdiction, their capital resources, risk exposures, and risk management processes, and hence their capital adequacy.

At the consolidated Group level, capital is calculated for prudential regulatory purposes using the Basel III framework as implemented in the UK. We refer to the UK Capital Requirements Regulation, the PRA Rulebook and any laws, regulations, requirements, rules, guidelines, standards and policies relating to capital adequacy, leverage and liquidity adopted by the relevant regulators, as applicable, and which are applicable to HSBC, as the 'Prudential rules'. Any references to European Union ('EU') regulations and directives (including technical standards) should, as applicable, be read as references to the UK's version of such regulation and/or directive, as onshored into UK law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as may be subsequently amended under UK law.

The regulators of the Group's banking entities outside the UK are at varying stages of implementation of Basel's framework, so local regulation may have been on the basis of Basel I, II, III or Basel 3.1. Further details on our implementation of Basel 3.1 for the consolidated group can be found on page 5 within the key changes and regulatory assessments section.

While the frameworks may vary, the Group's disclosure requirements are unaffected by variations in local regulatory frameworks except where these impact distributions, non-controlling interests and minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities ('MREL').

We publish our Pillar 3 Disclosures quarterly on our website https://www.hsbc.com/investors.

Regulatory reporting processes and controls

We have been advancing our programme aimed at strengthening our global regulatory reporting processes, and making them more sustainable, including enhancing data, consistency and controls. While this programme continues, there may be further impacts on some of our regulatory ratios as we implement recommended changes and continue to enhance our controls across the process.

Comparatives and references

To give insight into movements during 2026, we provide comparative figures, commentary on variances and flow tables for capital requirements. In all the tables where the term 'capital requirements' is used, this represents the minimum total capital charge set at 8% of risk-weighted assets ('RWAs') by Article 92(1) of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation. Narratives are included to explain quantitative disclosures where necessary.

The regulatory numbers and ratios presented in this document were accurate as at the date of reporting. Small changes may exist between these numbers and ratios and those subsequently submitted in regulatory filings. Where differences are significant, we may restate in subsequent periods.

Where disclosures have been enhanced, or are new, we do not generally restate or provide comparatives. Wherever specific rows and columns in the tables prescribed are not applicable or are immaterial to our activities, we omit them and follow the same approach for comparatives.

In accordance with the PRA's disclosure requirements, we have shaded cells where no information is required to be disclosed.

Pillar 3 requirements may be met by inclusion in other disclosure media. Where we adopt this approach, references are provided to the relevant pages of the Earnings Release 3Q26 of HSBC Holdings plc or to other documents.

The table below references where disclosures have been enhanced.

Page ref Table Reference Activity

12 Table 9ii - KM2 ARG Effective 31 March 2026, exclusion

of own credit standing and inclusion of accrued interest in tier 2 ('T2') and MREL instruments.

Governance

Our Pillar 3 Disclosures are governed by the Group's regulatory reporting policy and associated internal controls framework. This document has been approved by the Group Chief Financial Officer following recommendation by the Group Disclosure Committee ('GDC'). In this context, the GDC acts under delegated authority from the Group Audit Committee.

Highlights CET1 capital and ratio

Our common equity tier 1 ('CET1') capital was $128.1bn and our ratio was 13.9% compared with 14.1% at 30 June 2026, reflecting an increase in risk-weighted assets ('RWAs'), together with a decrease in the fair value of hold-to-collect-and-sell debt instruments due to higher yields and the impact of our share buy-back announced at our interim results, partly offset by regulatory profits net of dividends.

We intend to continue to manage our CET1 capital ratio within our medium-term target operating range of 14%-14.5%.

CET1 capital and ratio

We maintain our dividend payout ratio target basis of 50% of earnings per share ('EPS') for 2026, 2027 and 2028, excluding material notable items and related impacts.

The Board has approved a third interim dividend of $0.10 per share. On 28 September 2026, we completed the $1bn share buy-back announced at our interim results. We have announced with our 3Q26 results the intention to initiate a share buy-back of up to $1bn, which we expect to complete by our 2026 full-year results announcement.

CET1 ratio movement

124.0

14.9%

14.5%

14.0%

14.1%

13.9%

127.8 132.6

127.7 128.1

14.1%

0.0

13.9%

(0.5) (0.1)

(0.3) 0.0

(0.2)

0.9

30 Sep 25 31 Dec 25 31 Mar 26 30 Jun 26 30 Sep 26

30 Jun 26 Regulatory

profits

Dividend Share buy-back

Strategic initiatives

Change in RWAs

FX

translation differences

FVOCI

and Other

30 Sep 26

RWAs

RWAs increased by $16.0bn to $922.4bn compared with 30 June 2026. The increase was primarily driven by asset size movements of

$18.7bn from increases in sovereign exposures, lending and financial commitments, and a $5.9bn rise from the impact of redeveloped probability of default ('PD') models. Methodology and policy changes reduced RWAs by $6.0bn, primarily driven by a significant risk transfer transaction executed through the issuance of a credit-linked note ('CLN') in our UK business, and changes to the market risk capital multiplier.

RWAs by risk type

Risk-weighted assets

30 Sep 2026

$bn

30 Jun 2026

$bn

Credit risk

722.8

707.9

Counterparty credit risk

48.7

48.3

Market risk

31.3

30.6

Operational risk

119.6

119.6

Total RWAs

922.4

906.4

Leverage

Our leverage ratio was 4.9%, unchanged from 30 June 2026, reflecting a marginal increase in leverage exposures driven by growth in the balance sheet and a reduction in tier 1 capital.

Liquidity

The Group liquidity coverage ratio ('LCR') was 132% or $175bn above the regulatory requirement for the 12 months to 30 September 2026, and 134% or $179bn at 30 June 2026. The average high-quality liquid assets ('HQLA') were $719bn for 30 September 2026 and

$714bn for 30 June 2026.

At 30 September 2026, our Group net stable funding ratio ('NSFR') was 139% compared with 140% at 30 June 2026. At 30 September 2026, all material operating entities were above regulatory minimum levels.

Leverage

30 Sep 2026

30 Jun 2026

Tier 1 capital (leverage) ($bn)

150.5

151.3

Total leverage ratio exposure ($bn)

3,090.0

3,076.2

Leverage ratio (%)

4.9

4.9

Liquidity

30 Sep 2026

30 Jun 2026

LCR (%)

132

134

NSFR (%)

139

140

Key metrics

The table below sets out the key regulatory metrics covering the Group's available capital (including buffer requirements and ratios), RWAs, leverage ratio, LCR and NSFR. LCR is reported as the average of the preceding 12 months while NSFR is reported as the average of the preceding four quarter-end values.

Table 1: Key metrics (KM1)

At

30 Sep 2026

30 Jun 2026

31 Mar 2026

31 Dec 2025

30 Sep 2025

Available capital ($bn)

1

Common equity tier 1 ('CET1') capital

128.1

127.7

124.0

132.6

127.8

2

Tier 1 capital

150.5

151.3

146.2

153.4

148.6

3

Total capital

176.8

178.8

174.0

182.4

177.7

Risk-weighted assets ($bn)

4

Total RWAs

922.4

906.4

883.8

888.6

878.8

Capital ratios (%)

5

CET1

13.9

14.1

14.0

14.9

14.5

6

Tier 1

16.3

16.7

16.5

17.3

16.9

7

Total capital

19.2

19.7

19.7

20.5

20.2

Additional own funds requirements based on Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process ('SREP') as a percentage of RWAs (%)

UK-7a

Additional CET1 SREP requirements

1.4

1.4

1.4

1.4

1.4

UK-7b

Additional AT1 SREP requirements

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

UK-7c

Additional tier 2 ('T2') SREP requirements

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

UK-7d

Total SREP own funds requirements

10.5

10.5

10.5

10.5

10.5

Combined buffer requirement as a percentage of RWAs (%)

8

Capital conservation buffer requirement

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

9

Institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer

0.8

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

10

Global systemically important institution buffer

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

11

Combined buffer requirement

5.3

5.2

5.2

5.2

5.2

UK-11a

Overall capital requirements

15.8

15.8

15.7

15.7

15.7

12

CET1 available after meeting the total SREP own funds requirements

8.0

8.2

8.1

9.0

8.6

Leverage ratio

13

Total exposure measure excluding claims on central banks ($bn)

3,090.0

3,076.2

2,947.0

2,877.1

2,840.5

14

Leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%)

4.9

4.9

5.0

5.3

5.2

Additional leverage ratio disclosure requirements

14b

Leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%)

4.4

4.4

4.5

4.7

4.6

14c

Average leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%)

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.3

5.3

14d

Average leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%)

4.4

4.5

4.4

4.7

4.7

14e

Countercyclical leverage ratio buffer (%)

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

EU-14d

Leverage ratio buffer requirement (%)

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.9

0.9

EU-14e

Overall leverage ratio requirements (%)

4.3

4.3

4.2

4.2

4.2

Liquidity coverage ratio ('LCR') ($bn)

15

Total high-quality liquid assets

719.4

713.7

710.6

702.1

690.2

UK-16a

Cash outflows - total weighted value

758.2

740.1

719.8

697.0

682.2

UK-16b

Cash inflows - total weighted value

214.1

205.6

194.7

184.9

183.9

16

Total net cash outflow

544.1

534.5

525.1

512.1

498.3

17

LCR (%)

132

134

135

137

139

Net stable funding ratio ('NSFR') ($bn)

18

Total available stable funding

1,685.5

1,663.6

1,645.1

1,621.0

1,588.6

19

Total required stable funding

1,211.9

1,184.6

1,157.1

1,133.3

1,104.1

20

NSFR (%)

139

140

142

143

144

Key changes and regulatory assessments Disposals

During the third quarter of 2026, we completed the sale of our operations in Uruguay, which reduced our RWAs by $1.3bn, excluding operational risk RWAs.

In addition, we announced the sale of HSBC Life Singapore. In Australia, we announced the sale of our portfolio of home and personal loans, the planned wind-down of the remaining retail business and the transfer of our Corporate and Institutional Banking ('CIB'), Private Banking and Asset Management businesses to the Sydney branch of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, simplifying our entity footprint. In Egypt, we announced the sale of our retail banking business. The completion of announced disposals and related actions remains subject to relevant regulatory and other approvals. We have commenced a strategic review of our retail business and domestic-focused small and mid-sized corporate banking operations in Türkiye. Our international wholesale client business in Türkiye is unaffected by this review.

u For further details of business disposals, see page 13 of the Earnings Release 3Q26.

Basel 3.1

In January 2026, the PRA published its final rules to implement the Basel Committee's reforms to the prudential framework ('Basel 3.1') in the UK. While the implementation of the overall package is scheduled for 1 January 2027, the market risk internal models approach ('IMA') has been delayed until 1 January 2028, given the uncertainty in the rules and timing in other major jurisdictions.

In June 2026, the PRA consulted on targeted updates to the IMA to improve international alignment and ensure the requirements are proportionate. The proposals include extending the monitoring period for new market risk models, providing clearer guidance where data is limited and updating the approach for risks that cannot be reliably modelled.

We continue to assess the anticipated impact of the final Basel 3.1 standards on our capital. We expect, based on our latest modelling, that the impact on the Group CET1 capital ratio at 1 January 2027 will be a benefit of approximately 40-50bps. The final impact will depend on a number of factors, including model and data refinements, portfolio size and composition and supervisory permissions granted. Any related reductions to firm-specific capital requirements are not expected to be significant.

Capital Approach and policy

Our approach to capital management is driven by our strategic and organisational requirements, taking into account the regulatory, economic and commercial environment. We aim to maintain a strong capital base to support the risks inherent in our business and invest in accordance with our strategy, meeting both consolidated and local regulatory capital requirements at all times.

As at 30 September 2026, capital securities included in the capital base of HSBC have been issued in accordance with the Prudential rules. Capital securities are regularly reviewed for compliance with guidelines. Effective 1 January 2025, the IFRS 9 transitional arrangements came to an end, followed by the end of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation grandfathering provisions on 28 June 2025. Our capital figures are therefore the same, for both the transitional and end-point basis. A list of the main features of our capital instruments and eligible liabilities, in accordance with Article 437 and Article 437a of the PRA Rulebook, is also published on our website at https://www.hsbc.com with reference to our balance sheet on 30 June 2026. The full terms and conditions of our securities are also available at https://www.hsbc.com.

Own funds

HSBC has no current or foreseen practical or legal impediment envisaged with regard to planned dividends or payments from material subsidiaries to the parent. However, the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or advance monies to HSBC Holdings depends on, among other things, their respective local regulatory capital and banking requirements, exchange controls, statutory reserves, and financial and operating performance. None of our subsidiaries that are excluded from the regulatory consolidation had capital resources below their minimum regulatory requirement as at 30 September 2026.

u For further details of our approach to treasury risk management, including capital risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk in the banking book, non-trading foreign exchange exposure and pension risk, see page 156 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2025.

The table below provides the key components covering our CET1, tier 1, tier 2 capital and the regulatory adjustments impacting our capital base. Table 2: Own funds disclosure

At

30 Sep 2026

$m

30 Jun 2026

$m

6

Common equity tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments

166,952

167,958

28

Total regulatory adjustments to common equity tier 1 capital

(38,809)

(40,266)

29

Common equity tier 1 ('CET1') capital

128,143

127,692

36

Additional tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments

22,421

23,722

43

Total regulatory adjustments to additional tier 1 capital

(70)

(70)

44

Additional tier 1 capital

22,351

23,652

45

Tier 1 capital (T1 = CET1 + Additional tier 1 ('AT1'))

150,494

151,344

51

Tier 2 capital before regulatory adjustments

28,004

29,142

57

Total regulatory adjustments to tier 2 capital

(1,700)

(1,710)

58

Tier 2 capital

26,304

27,432

59

Total capital (TC = T1 + T2)

176,798

178,776

At 30 September 2026, our CET1 capital ratio decreased to 13.9% from 14.1% at 30 June 2026, driven by:

  • a 0.3 percentage point decrease due to higher RWAs excluding foreign exchange translation differences, mainly from asset size and model updates;

  • a 0.2 percentage point decrease mainly due to a decrease in the fair value of hold-to-collect-and-sell debt instruments, due to higher yields;

  • a 0.1 percentage point decrease due to the share buy-back announced with our interim results; and

  • a 0.4 percentage point increase in CET1 capital generation, through regulatory profits net of dividends.

    At 30 September 2026, our Pillar 2A requirement was $23.4bn, equivalent to 2.5% of RWAs as per the PRA's Individual Capital Requirement based on a point-in-time assessment, of which 1.4% was met by CET1 capital. Throughout 3Q26, we complied with the PRA's regulatory capital adequacy requirement.

    Risk-weighted assets

    The table below shows total RWAs including free deliveries, and the corresponding total own funds requirement split by risk type. Equities under the simple risk-weighted approach include off-balance sheet collective investment undertakings ('CIU') equity exposures, calculated as per the PRA Rulebook Article 132(c), and 'Other counterparty credit risk' includes securities financing transactions RWAs. Amounts below the thresholds for deduction are included in rows 2 and 5 of the table and include thresholds for the recognition of significant investments and deferred tax assets.

    Table 3: Overview of risk-weighted exposure amounts (OV1)

    At At

    30 Sep 2026

    30 Sep 2026

    30 Jun 2026

    30 Jun 2026

    RWAs

    $m

    Total own

    funds requirements

    $m

    RWAs

    $m

    Total own

    funds requirements

    $m

    1

    Credit risk (excluding counterparty credit risk)

    708,914

    56,714

    696,178

    55,694

    2

    - standardised approach

    206,281

    16,503

    202,904

    16,232

    3

    - foundation IRB approach

    94,746

    7,580

    90,990

    7,279

    4

    - slotting approach

    18,923

    1,514

    20,787

    1,663

    UK-4a

    - equities under the simple risk-weighted approach

    5,001

    400

    4,894

    392

    5

    - advanced IRB approach

    383,963

    30,717

    376,603

    30,128

    6

    Counterparty credit risk

    48,630

    3,890

    48,179

    3,855

    7

    - standardised approach

    11,408

    913

    11,974

    949

    8

    - internal model method

    17,280

    1,382

    15,508

    1,250

    UK-8a

    - exposures to a central counterparty

    2,370

    190

    2,683

    215

    UK-8b

    - credit valuation adjustment

    2,068

    165

    1,478

    118

    9

    - other counterparty credit risk

    15,504

    1,240

    16,536

    1,323

    15

    Settlement risk

    63

    5

    71

    6

    16

    Securitisation exposures in the non-trading book (after the cap)

    13,904

    1,112

    11,748

    941

    17

    - internal ratings-based approach ('SEC-IRBA')

    6,577

    526

    3,883

    311

    18

    - external ratings-based approach ('SEC-ERBA') (including internal assessment approach

    ('IAA'))

    1,392

    111

    1,396

    112

    19

    - standardised approach ('SEC-SA')

    5,935

    475

    6,469

    518

    20

    Position, foreign exchange and commodities risks (market risk)

    31,285

    2,503

    30,631

    2,450

    21

    - standardised approach

    9,849

    788

    10,239

    819

    22

    - internal models approach

    21,436

    1,715

    20,392

    1,631

    Operational risk

    119,598

    9,568

    119,610

    9,569

    UK-23b

    - standardised approach

    119,598

    9,568

    119,610

    9,569

    29

    Total

    922,394

    73,792

    906,417

    72,515

    24

    - of which: Amounts below the thresholds for deduction (subject to 250% risk weight)

    47,395

    3,792

    45,932

    3,675

    The quarter-on-quarter RWA movements in the table above are explained by risk type in the following comments.

    Credit risk, including securitisation

    Credit risk RWAs at 30 September 2026, including securitisation, increased by $14.9bn compared with 30 June 2026, driven by:

  • a $16.9bn rise in asset size from higher sovereign exposures in our International Wealth and Premier Banking ('IWPB') business, arising from participation in the Foreign Currency Non-Resident Deposit scheme in India, lending growth in our CIB and UK businesses and an increase in financial commitments in our Hong Kong business;

  • a $5.2bn increase primarily due to the impact of a redeveloped PD model for large corporates mainly in CIB, partly offset by reductions in our UK and Hong Kong businesses, as well as an increase for the small and medium-sized enterprises PD model in our UK business;

  • a $4.5bn decrease from methodology and policy changes, primarily driven by a significant risk transfer transaction executed through the issuance of a CLN in our UK business, and data refinements resulting in lower RWAs across CIB, partly offset by higher RWAs in our Hong Kong business;

  • a $1.3bn fall as a result of the sale of our operations in Uruguay; and

  • a $1.3bn decrease mainly due to asset quality movements from changes in credit risk parameters and composition of the underlying portfolios in our CIB and Hong Kong businesses, partly offset by unfavourable credit risk migrations, mainly in our UK business.

Counterparty credit risk, including settlement risk

Counterparty credit risk RWAs increased by $0.4bn driven by higher sovereign exposures in IWPB arising from participation in the Foreign Currency Non-Resident Deposit scheme in India and the impact of a redeveloped PD model for large corporates, largely offset by lower securities financing transactions in CIB.

Market risk

Market risk RWAs increased by $0.7bn, mainly due to higher stressed value at risk ('SVaR'), reflecting changes in the trading portfolio's risk profile under stressed market conditions, partly offset by changes to the capital multiplier.

Operational risk

Operational risk RWAs decreased marginally, driven by foreign currency translation differences.

The table below shows the drivers of the quarterly changes in credit risk RWAs under the IRB approach. These include free deliveries but exclude exposures to counterparty credit risk, securitisation positions, equity exposures and non-credit obligation assets. Foreign exchange movements in this disclosure are computed by retranslating the RWAs into US dollars based on the underlying transactional currencies.

Table 4: RWA flow statements of credit risk exposures under the IRB approach (CR8)

Quarter ended

30 Sep 2026

$m

30 Jun 2026

$m

31 Mar 2026

$m

31 Dec 2025

$m

1

RWAs at the opening period

475,456

461,900

460,105

471,315

2

Asset size

10,135

14,603

9,556

2,389

3

Asset quality

(1,893)

3,883

(3,122)

(3,387)

4

Model updates

5,216

393

(390)

(17)

5

Methodology and policy

(4,240)

(5,171)

(432)

(10,538)

6

Acquisitions and disposals

(195)

-

(835)

(36)

7

Foreign exchange movements

316

(152)

(2,982)

379

9

RWAs at the closing period

484,795

475,456

461,900

460,105

Excluding the $0.3bn foreign exchange movements, RWAs under the IRB approach increased by $9.0bn during 3Q26, primarily due to asset size movements, mainly in IWPB due to increases in sovereign exposures arising from participation in the Foreign Currency Non-Resident Deposit scheme in India and lending growth in our CIB and UK businesses. A further increase was driven by the impact of a redeveloped PD model for large corporates mainly in CIB, partly offset by reductions in our UK and Hong Kong businesses, as well as an increase for the small and medium-sized enterprises PD model in our UK business.

Methodology and policy changes reduced RWAs, mainly driven by a significant risk transfer transaction executed through the issuance of a CLN in our UK business. RWAs reduced further due to asset quality movements from changes in credit risk parameters and composition of the underlying portfolios in our CIB and Hong Kong businesses, partly offset by unfavourable credit risk migrations, mainly in our UK business.

The table below shows the drivers of the quarterly movements of counterparty credit risk RWAs under the internal model method approach.

Table 5: RWA flow statements of CCR exposures under IMM (CCR7)

Quarter ended

30 Sep 2026

$m

30 Jun 2026

$m

31 Mar 2026

$m

31 Dec 2025

$m

1

RWAs at the opening period

15,508

14,868

15,011

14,381

2

Asset size

929

658

187

410

3

Credit quality of counterparties

843

(18)

(216)

(28)

5

Methodology and policy (IMM only)

-

-

(114)

248

9

RWAs at the closing period

17,280

15,508

14,868

15,011

RWAs under the IMM approach increased by $1.8bn in 3Q26, mainly driven by higher sovereign exposures in IWPB arising from participation in the Foreign Currency Non-Resident Deposit scheme in India and the impact of a redeveloped PD model for large corporates in CIB.

The table below shows the drivers of the quarterly movements of market risk RWAs under internal models approach ('IMA'), split by value at risk ('VaR'), SVaR, incremental risk charge ('IRC') and other models. Rows 1a/1b and 8a/8b represent differences between RWAs reported for the period and RWAs calculated on a spot basis at the end of the reporting period, except RWAs in 'Other', which includes components that are calculated on an average basis.

Table 6: RWA flow statements of market risk exposures under IMA (MR2-B)

VaR

$m

Stressed

VaR

$m

IRC

$m

Other

$m

Total RWAs

$m

Total own

funds requirements

$m

1

RWAs at 1 Jul 2026

6,586

7,477

4,742

1,587

20,392

1,631

1a

Regulatory adjustment

(4,891)

(5,158)

(117)

-

(10,166)

(813)

1b

RWAs at the previous quarter end (end of day)

1,695

2,319

4,625

1,587

10,226

818

2

Movement in risk levels

621

1,712

143

55

2,531

202

4

Methodology and policy

(706)

(865)

-

-

(1,571)

(125)

8a

RWAs at the end of the reporting period (end of day)

1,610

3,166

4,768

1,642

11,186

895

8b

Regulatory adjustment

3,856

6,105

289

-

10,250

820

8

RWAs at 30 Sep 2026

5,466

9,271

5,057

1,642

21,436

1,715

1

RWAs at 1 Apr 2026

5,810

9,711

5,224

1,628

22,373

1,790

1a

Regulatory adjustment

(4,038)

(7,103)

(10)

-

(11,151)

(892)

1b

RWAs at the previous quarter end (end of day)

1,772

2,608

5,214

1,628

11,222

898

2

Movement in risk levels

(77)

(289)

(589)

(41)

(996)

(80)

4

Methodology and policy

-

-

-

-

-

-

8a

RWAs at the end of the reporting period (end of day)

1,695

2,319

4,625

1,587

10,226

818

8b

Regulatory adjustment

4,891

5,158

117

-

10,166

813

8

RWAs at 30 Jun 2026

6,586

7,477

4,742

1,587

20,392

1,631

RWAs under IMA increased by $1.0bn during 3Q26, mainly due to higher SVaR reflecting changes in the trading portfolio's risk profile under stressed market conditions, partly offset by changes to the capital multiplier.

Leverage

We manage our leverage ratio in order to maintain appropriate levels of leverage to support our business strategy, and meet our regulatory and stress testing-related requirements.

u For further details of our Treasury risk management framework see page 156 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2025.

The table below provides information on UK leverage ratios, buffers and average leverage ratios as per the UK's leverage ratio framework.

Table 7: Leverage ratio common disclosure (UK LR2-LRCom)

At

30 Sep 2026

$bn

30 Jun 2026

$bn

25 Leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%)

4.9

4.9

UK-25c Leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%)

4.4

4.4

27 Leverage ratio buffer (%)

1.0

1.0

UK-27a - of which: G-SII or O-SII additional leverage ratio buffer (%)

0.7

0.7

UK-27b - of which: countercyclical leverage ratio buffer (%)

0.3

0.3

UK-32 Average total exposure measure excluding claims on central banks

3,107.9

3,017.6

UK-33 Average leverage ratio including claims on central banks (%)

4.4

4.5

UK-34 Average leverage ratio excluding claims on central banks (%)

4.9

5.0

Our leverage ratio of 4.9% at 30 September 2026 was unchanged from 30 June 2026, reflecting a marginal increase in leverage exposures driven by growth in the balance sheet and a reduction in tier 1 capital.

At 30 September 2026, our UK minimum leverage ratio requirement was 3.25%, with an additional buffer of 1.0% comprising a 0.7% additional leverage ratio buffer and a 0.3% countercyclical leverage ratio buffer.

These buffers translated into capital values of $21.6bn and $9.3bn respectively. We exceeded these leverage requirements throughout 3Q26.

The average leverage ratio was 4.9% at 30 September 2026, down from 5.0% at 30 June 2026. This was driven by an increase in the average leverage exposures, mainly from growth in the average balance sheet, which led to a 0.1 percentage point fall in the average leverage ratio, partly offset by a marginal rise in average T1 capital.

Liquidity Management of liquidity and funding risk

We manage liquidity and funding risk at an operating entity level, in accordance with globally consistent policies, procedures and reporting standards.

Liquidity coverage ratio

The LCR aims to ensure that a bank has sufficient unencumbered HQLA to meet its liquidity needs in a 30-calendar day liquidity stress scenario. For the disclosure of the LCR, we follow Article 451a of the PRA Rulebook.

The average Group LCR for the 12 months to 30 September 2026 was 132% or $175bn above the regulatory requirement and 134% or

$179bn for the 12 months to 30 June 2026. At 30 September 2026, our Group LCR and all of the material operating entities remained above their minimum required regulatory levels. The Group consolidation methodology includes a deduction to reflect the impact of limitations in the transferability of entity liquidity around the Group. The result was an adjustment of $144bn to LCR HQLA and $5bn to LCR inflows on an average basis.

The average Group LCR HQLA of $719bn (30 June 2026: $714bn) was held in a range of asset classes and currencies.

The Group and its entities actively manage liquidity and funding drivers within their balance sheets, including derivatives and collateral management.

Cross-currency management

The Group's internal liquidity and funding risk management framework requires all operating entities to monitor the material currency positions. Limits are set to ensure that outflows can be met, given assumptions on stressed capacity in the foreign exchange swap markets. This continuous monitoring helps with the overall management of currency exposures, in line with our internal framework.

Net stable funding ratio

We use the NSFR or other appropriate metrics as a basis for ensuring operating entities maintain a stable funding profile to support their business activities. The NSFR is defined as the ratio between the amount of stable funding available and the amount of stable funding required. The average Group NSFR over the previous four quarters was 139% at 30 September 2026 and 140% at 30 June 2026.

Sources of funding

Our primary sources of funding are customer current accounts and savings deposits payable on demand or at short notice. We issue secured and unsecured wholesale securities to supplement customer deposits, meet regulatory obligations and to change the currency mix, maturity profile, or location of our liabilities.

The funding risk management framework seeks to ensure operating entities maintain a diversified funding profile defined in their funding plans, which are taken through regular governance, in line with globally consistent policies and standards. Diversification is achieved through a balanced mix of funding sources, tenors, currencies and geographies, seeking to mitigate concentration risks and to avoid extraordinary reliance on central banks or intra-group funding support. The framework requires entities to have policies, processes and controls for monitoring and managing funding by tenors and sources, supported by governance of limits. Entities also model cashflows from maturing short-term debts within the internal liquidity monitoring to help ensure sufficient liquidity is maintained to meet the maturing debt obligations.

u For further details of our approach to treasury risk management, see page 156 of the Annual Report and Accounts 2025.

u For further details on the concentration of funding and liquidity sources, see page 73 of the Interim Report 2026.

The table below sets out the granular split of cash outflows and cash inflows, as well as the available HQLA on both an unweighted and weighted basis, which are used to derive the LCR. All figures are based on the average over the preceding 12 months. The unsecured wholesale funding in the below table includes excess operational deposits of $201bn for the period ended 30 September 2026 and $194bn for the period ended 30 June 2026.

Table 8: Quantitative information of LCR (UK LIQ1)

Quarter ended 30 Sep 2026

Quarter 30 Jun

ended 2026

Quarter 31 Mar

ended 2026

Quarter 31 Dec

ended 2025

Total unweighted

value

$m

Total weighted

value

$m

Total unweighted

value

$m

Total weighted

value

$m

Total unweighted

value

$m

Total weighted

value

$m

Total unweighted

value

$m

Total weighted

value

$m

UK-1b

Number of data points used in the calculation of averages

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

High quality liquid assets

1

Total high quality liquid assets ('HQLA')

719,376

713,669

710,604

702,123

Cash outflows

2

Retail deposits and small business funding

912,612

98,024

903,344

97,200

895,966

96,447

880,824

95,013

- of which:

3

stable deposits

409,020

20,451

401,455

20,072

395,407

19,770

385,826

19,291

4

less stable deposits

503,592

77,573

501,889

77,128

500,559

76,677

494,998

75,722

5

Unsecured wholesale funding

899,485

409,571

881,587

403,596

859,158

393,877

836,769

384,384

6

- operational deposits (all counterparties) and deposits in networks of cooperative banks

69,308

329,329

10,934

275,311

595,019

11,257

67,053

325,286

11,257

266,616

581,544

10,998

64,958

317,921

10,998

256,413

568,558

11,798

62,495

310,091

11,798

284,623

7

- non-operational deposits (all counterparties)

603,928

8

- unsecured debt

10,934

9

Secured wholesale funding

53,847

47,488

41,145

37,536

10

Additional requirements

410,176

120,247

396,979

113,891

386,785

110,253

372,458

104,840

11

- outflows related to derivative exposures and other collateral requirements

64,656

54,835

58,657

49,599

55,763

47,178

52,608

44,140

13

- credit and liquidity facilities

345,520

65,412

338,322

64,292

331,022

63,075

319,850

60,700

14

Other contractual funding obligations

93,721

46,296

94,228

48,559

93,712

49,703

90,722

48,016

15

Other contingent funding obligations

697,559

30,189

685,246

29,392

674,080

28,407

664,016

27,232

16

Total cash outflows

758,174

740,126

719,832

697,021

Cash inflows

17

Secured lending transactions (including reverse repos)

520,440

73,018

502,008

68,873

475,918

62,681

447,356

57,670

18

Inflows from fully performing exposures

104,601

75,618

101,174

73,535

97,281

70,907

95,474

70,108

19

Other cash inflows

106,594

65,407

102,824

63,197

99,806

61,122

94,592

57,151

20

Total cash inflows

731,635

214,043

706,006

205,605

673,005

194,710

637,422

184,929

UK-20c

Inflows subject to 75% Cap

731,635

214,043

706,006

205,605

673,005

194,710

637,422

184,929

Liquidity coverage ratio (Adjusted value)

UK-21

Liquidity buffer

719,376

713,669

710,604

702,123

22

Total net cash outflows

544,131

534,521

525,122

512,092

23

Liquidity coverage ratio (%)

132

134

135

137

Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities

A minimum requirement for total loss-absorbing capacity ('TLAC') in line with the final standards adopted by the Financial Stability Board ('FSB') came into effect in the UK in January 2019. This includes a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities ('MREL').

MREL includes own funds and eligible liabilities that can be written down or converted into capital resources in order to absorb losses or recapitalise a bank in the event of its failure. The framework is complemented with disclosure requirements and these disclosures are based on the formats provided in the Basel Committee Standards for Pillar 3 disclosure requirements.

In line with our existing structure and business model, HSBC has three resolution groups - the European resolution group ('ERG'), the Asian resolution group ('ARG') and the US resolution group ('URG').

In addition, there are some smaller entities that fall outside these resolution groups.

HSBC is expected to maintain a sufficient amount of resources that can credibly and feasibly be used to absorb losses in resolution, and recapitalise to a level that ensures compliance with the conditions for regulatory authorisation and sustains market confidence. Further details on HSBC's resolvability can be found in our Resolvability Assessment Framework available on the hsbc.com website.

Key metrics of the resolution groups

The Group and the ERG report in accordance with Prudential rules, while reporting for the ARG and URG follow the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ('HKMA') regulatory rules and US regulatory rules respectively. The ARG results reflect the implementation of the Basel

3.1 standards in Hong Kong from 1 January 2025.

Leverage exposures and ratios in the ERG exclude central bank claims, in line with UK PRA rules. For URG, leverage exposures and ratios are based on 'total assets for the leverage ratio' as reported in US regulatory capital calculations.

The following tables summarise key metrics for the TLAC of each of the Group's three resolution groups.

Table 9.i: Key metrics of the European resolution group (KM2)

At

30 Sep 2026

$bn

30 Jun 2026

$bn

31 Mar 2026

$bn

31 Dec 2025

$bn

30 Sep 2025

$bn

1

Total loss absorbing capacity ('TLAC') available

114.1

116.9

113.0

116.5

111.0

2

Total RWAs at the level of the resolution group

337.9

334.1

324.3

327.7

319.4

3

TLAC as a percentage of RWA (row1/row2) (%)

33.8

35.0

34.8

35.5

34.7

4

Leverage exposure measure at the level of the resolution group

1,230.8

1,239.3

1,189.3

1,163.3

1,144.6

5

TLAC as a percentage of leverage exposure measure (row1/row4) (%)

9.3

9.4

9.5

10.0

9.7

6a

Does the subordination exemption in the antepenultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6b

Does the subordination exemption in the penultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6c

If the capped subordination exemption applies, the amount of funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that is recognised as external TLAC, divided by funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that would be recognised as external TLAC if no cap was applied (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Table 9.ii: Key metrics of the Asian resolution group¹ (KM2)

At

30 Sep 2026

$bn

30 Jun 2026

$bn

31 Mar 2026

$bn

31 Dec 2025

$bn

30 Sep 2025

$bn

1

Total loss absorbing capacity ('TLAC') available

124.7

123.2

119.5

120.6

116.4

2

Total RWAs at the level of the resolution group

411.3

399.6

385.6

380.0

388.7

3

TLAC as a percentage of RWA (row1/row2) (%)

30.3

30.8

31.0

31.7

29.9

4

Leverage exposure measure at the level of the resolution group

1,530.2

1,504.3

1,432.5

1,384.6

1,379.9

5

TLAC as a percentage of leverage exposure measure (row1/row4) (%)

8.1

8.2

8.3

8.7

8.4

6a

Does the subordination exemption in the antepenultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6b

Does the subordination exemption in the penultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6c

If the capped subordination exemption applies, the amount of funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that is recognised as external TLAC, divided by funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that would be recognised as external TLAC if no cap was applied (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 From 31 March 2026, the regulatory valuation of T2 capital and TLAC excludes own credit standing and includes accrued interest. Prior periods have not been restated.

Table 9.iii: Key metrics of the US resolution group (KM2)

At

30 Sep 2026

$bn

30 Jun 2026

$bn

31 Mar 2026

$bn

31 Dec 2025

$bn

30 Sep 2025

$bn

1

Total loss absorbing capacity ('TLAC') available

25.3

24.9

24.8

24.0

24.2

2

Total RWAs at the level of the resolution group

114.1

112.7

110.5

109.7

110.9

3

TLAC as a percentage of RWA (row1/row2) (%)

22.2

22.1

22.4

21.9

21.8

4

Leverage exposure measure at the level of the resolution group

239.8

239.9

236.9

237.6

238.4

5

TLAC as a percentage of leverage exposure measure (row1/row4) (%)

10.6

10.4

10.5

10.1

10.1

6a

Does the subordination exemption in the antepenultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6b

Does the subordination exemption in the penultimate paragraph of section 11 of the FSB TLAC term sheet apply?

No

No

No

No

No

6c

If the capped subordination exemption applies, the amount of funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that is recognised as external TLAC, divided by funding issued that ranks pari passu with excluded liabilities and that would be recognised as external TLAC if no cap was applied (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Abbreviations

$ United States dollar

1Q26 First quarter of 2026

2Q26 Second quarter of 2026

3Q26 Third quarter of 2026

AIRB1 Advanced internal ratings-based approach

ARG Asian resolution group

AT1 capital Additional tier 1 capital

Basel Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Basel III Basel Committee's reforms to strengthen global capital and liquidity rules Basel 3.1 Outstanding measures to be implemented from the Basel III reforms CCR1 Counterparty credit risk

CET11 Common equity tier 1

CIB Corporate and Institutional Banking

CIU Collective investment undertakings

CLN Credit-linked note

Dec December

ECL1 Expected credit losses

EPS Earnings per share

ERG European resolution group

ESG Environmental, social and governance

EU European Union

FIRB1 Foundation internal ratings-based approach

FSB Financial Stability Board

FX Foreign exchange

GDC Group Disclosure Committee

Group HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiary undertakings HKMA Hong Kong Monetary Authority

Hong Kong The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China HQLA High-quality liquid assets

HSBC HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiary undertakings IAA Internal assessment approach

IFRSs International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board IMA Internal models approach

IMM1 Internal model method

IRB1 Internal ratings-based approach

IRC Incremental risk charge

IWPB International Wealth and Premier Banking

Jun June

LCR1 Liquidity coverage ratio

Mar March

MREL Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities NSFR1 Net stable funding ratio

PRA1 Prudential Regulation Authority (UK)

PD Probability of default

Prudential rules Refers to the UK Capital Requirements Regulation, the PRA Rulebook and any laws, regulations, requirements, rules, guidelines, standards and policies relating to capital adequacy, leverage and liquidity adopted by the relevant regulators, as applicable, and which are applicable to HSBC

RWA1 Risk-weighted asset

SEC-ERBA Securitisation external rating-based approach SEC-IRBA Securitisation internal rating-based approach SEC-SA Securitisation standardised approach

Sep September

SREP Supervisory review and evaluation process

STD Standardised approach

SVaR Stressed value at risk

TLAC1 Total loss-absorbing capacity

T1 capital1 Tier 1 capital

T2 capital1 Tier 2 capital

UK United Kingdom

UK Capital Requirements Regulation

Refers to Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013, as amended or supplemented, as it forms part of domestic law in the UK by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended

URG US resolution group

US United States of America

VaR1 Value at risk

1 Full definition included in the Glossary published on HSBC website https://www.hsbc.com.

Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements

These Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 September 2026 contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to HSBC's financial condition; results of operations and business, including the strategic priorities; financial, investment and capital targets; and environmental, social and governance ('ESG') ambitions, targets and commitments described herein.

Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about HSBC's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Words such as 'may', 'will', 'should', 'expects', 'targets', 'anticipates', 'intends', 'plans', 'believes', 'seeks', 'estimates', 'potential' and 'reasonably possible', or the negative thereof, other variations thereon or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current plans, information, data, forecasts, estimates and projections, and therefore undue reliance should not be placed on them. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Any such forward-looking statements are not a reliable indicator of future performance, as they may involve significant stated or implied assumptions and subjective judgements which may or may not prove to be correct. There can be no assurance that any of the matters set out in forward-looking statements are attainable, will actually occur or will be realised or are complete or accurate. The assumptions and judgments may prove to be incorrect and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other important factors, many of which are outside the control of HSBC. HSBC makes no commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring or existing after the date of any forward-looking statements. Written and/or oral forward-looking statements may also be made in the periodic reports to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, summary financial statements to shareholders, offering circulars and prospectuses, press releases and other written materials, and in oral statements made by HSBC's directors, officers or employees to third parties, including financial analysts. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that a number of factors could cause actual results to differ, in some instances materially, from those anticipated or implied in any forward-looking statement. These include, but are not limited to:

  • changes in general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, such as new, continuing or deepening recessions, prolonged inflationary pressures and fluctuations in employment levels and the creditworthiness of customers beyond those factored into consensus forecasts; the Russia-Ukraine war (including hybrid attacks across Europe attributed to Russia), the conflict in the Middle East, or any potential military action or conflict elsewhere, and their impact on global economies and the markets where HSBC operates, which could have a material adverse effect on (among other things) our financial condition, results of operations, prospects, liquidity, capital position and credit ratings; deviations from the market and economic assumptions that form the basis for our ECL measurements (including, without limitation, as a result of the Russia-Ukraine war, the conflict in the Middle East, or any potential military action or conflict elsewhere, inflationary pressures, commodity price changes, and ongoing developments in the commercial real estate sector and the residential property sector in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong); potential changes in HSBC's dividend policy; changes and volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates levels, including the accounting impact resulting from financial reporting in respect of hyperinflationary economies; volatility in equity markets and the risk of disruptive correction stemming from high company valuations, including in the artificial intelligence and technology sectors; lack of liquidity in wholesale funding or capital markets, which may affect our ability to meet our obligations under financing facilities or to fund new loans, investments and businesses; geopolitical tensions or diplomatic developments producing social instability or legal uncertainty, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, the conflict in the Middle East, or any potential military action or conflict elsewhere, and the related imposition of sanctions, export-control and trade and investment restrictions, as well as increased market volatility, supply chain restrictions and disruptions, sustained increases in energy prices and key

    commodity prices, claims of human rights violations, diplomatic tensions and strategic competition between China and the US, which may extend to and involve other countries and territories, and developments in Hong Kong and Taiwan and the surrounding maritime region, alongside other potential areas of tension, which may adversely affect HSBC by creating regulatory, reputational and market risks; the efficacy of government, customer, and HSBC's actions in managing and mitigating ESG-related risks, in particular climate risk, nature-related risks and human rights risks, and in supporting the global transition to net zero carbon emissions, each of which can impact HSBC both directly and indirectly through our customers and which may result in potential financial and nonfinancial impacts; illiquidity and downward price pressure in national real estate markets; adverse changes in central banks' policies with respect to the provision of liquidity support to financial markets; heightened market concerns over sovereign creditworthiness, fiscal capacity and debt sustainability resulting in higher long-term government debt yields, which could also increase sovereign funding pressures and private sector borrowing costs and reduce the value of HSBC's sovereign bond holdings, along with the growing role of non-bank financial institutions in holding and intermediating sovereign debt and the continued growth of private equity and debt markets, which may amplify the transmission of market volatility and risks across markets; adverse changes in the funding status of public or private defined benefit pensions; the significant depreciation of the US dollar through 2025, with volatility expected to persist; societal shifts in customer financing and investment needs, including consumer perception as to the continuing availability of credit; exposure to counterparty risk, including third parties using us as a conduit for illegal activities without our knowledge; and price competition in the market segments we serve;

  • changes in government policy and regulation, as well as monetary, fiscal, interest rate and other policies of central banks and other regulatory authorities in the major markets in which we operate and the consequences thereof (including, without limitation, actions taken as a result of changes in government following national elections, higher social welfare commitments and increased government expenditure on defence, energy security and climate transition in the markets where the Group operates); continued volatility in trade and tariff policies, changes in tariff rates, including sector-specific measures imposed by various nations, including the US, which could reduce capital investment and consumer spending, disrupt supply chains and dampen global trade growth; initiatives to change the size, scope of activities and interconnectedness of financial institutions in connection with the implementation of stricter regulation of financial institutions in key markets worldwide; revised capital and liquidity benchmarks, which could serve to deleverage bank balance sheets and lower returns available from the current business model and portfolio mix; changes to tax laws and tax rates applicable to HSBC, including the imposition of levies or taxes designed to change business mix and risk appetite; the practices, pricing or responsibilities of financial institutions serving their consumer markets; expropriation, nationalisation, confiscation of assets and changes in legislation relating to foreign ownership; the UK's relationship with the EU, particularly with respect to the potential divergence of UK and EU law on the regulation of financial services; changes in government approach and regulatory treatment in relation to ESG disclosures and reporting requirements, and the current lack of a single standardised regulatory approach to ESG across all sectors and markets; changes in UK macroeconomic and fiscal policy, which may result in fluctuations in the value of the pound sterling; general changes in government policy (including, without limitation, actions taken as a result of changes in government following national elections in the markets where the Group operates) that may significantly influence investor decisions; the costs, effects and outcomes of regulatory reviews, actions or litigation, including any additional compliance requirements; and the effects of competition in the markets where we operate including increased competition from non-bank financial services companies; and

  • factors specific to HSBC, including our success in adequately identifying the risks we face, such as the incidence of loan losses or delinquency, and managing those risks (through account management, hedging and other techniques); our ability to achieve our financial, investment, capital and ESG ambitions, targets and commitments (including the positions set forth in our thermal coal phase-out policy and our energy policy and our targets to reduce our on-balance sheet financed emissions and, where applicable, facilitated emissions in our portfolio of selected high-emitting sectors), which may result in our failure to achieve any of the expected outcomes of our strategic priorities and may result in reputational risks; technology changes and developments, including the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, by HSBC, third-party service providers, counterparties, customers, competitors and other market participants, and related operational, cyber, fraud, data, regulatory, compliance, litigation, reputational and competitive risks, as well as such technological developments' impact on how we manage risk; model limitations or failure, including, without limitation, the impact that high inflationary pressures and interest rates have had on the performance and usage of financial models, which may require us to hold additional capital, incur losses and/or use compensating controls, such as judgemental post-model adjustments, to address model limitations; changes to the judgements, estimates and assumptions we base our financial statements on; changes in our ability to meet the requirements of regulatory stress tests; a reduction in the credit ratings assigned to us or any of our subsidiaries, which could increase the cost or decrease the availability of our funding and affect our liquidity position and net interest margin; changes to the reliability and security of our data management, data privacy, information and technology infrastructure, including threats from cyber-attacks, which may impact our ability to service clients and may result in financial loss, business disruption and/or loss of customer services and data; the accuracy and effective use of data, including internal management information that may not have been independently verified; changes in insurance customer behaviour and insurance claim rates; our dependence on loan payments and dividends from subsidiaries to meet our obligations; changes in our reporting

frameworks and accounting standards, which have had and may continue to have a material impact on the way we prepare our financial statements; our ability to successfully execute planned strategic acquisitions and disposals; our success in adequately integrating acquired businesses into our business; our ability to successfully execute and implement the announced strategic reorganisation of the Group; changes in our ability to manage third-party, fraud, financial crime and reputational risks inherent in our operations; employee misconduct, which may result in regulatory sanctions and/or reputational or financial harm; changes in skill requirements, ways of working and talent shortages, which may affect our ability to recruit and retain senior management and an inclusive and skilled workforce; and changes in our ability to develop sustainable finance and ESG-related products consistent with the evolving expectations of our regulators, and our capacity to measure the environmental and social impacts from our financing activity (including as a result of data limitations and changes in methodologies), which may affect our ability to achieve our ESG ambitions, targets and commitments, including our net zero ambition, our targets to reduce on-balance sheet financed emissions and, where applicable, facilitated emissions in our portfolio of selected high-emitting sectors and the positions set forth in our thermal coal phase-out policy and our energy policy, and increase the risk of greenwashing. Effective risk management depends on, among other things, our ability through stress testing and other techniques to prepare for events that cannot be captured by the statistical models it uses; our success in addressing operational, legal and regulatory, and litigation challenges; and other risks and uncertainties we identify in 'Risk -Managing risk' on page 41 of the Earnings Release 3Q26.

Additional detailed information concerning important factors, including but not limited to ESG-related factors, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or implied in any forward-looking statement in these Pillar 3 Disclosures at 30 September 2026 is available in our Annual Report and Accounts for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025, which was filed with the SEC on Form 20-F on 26 February 2026, our Earnings Release 1Q26, furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K on 5 May 2026, our Interim Report for the six months ended 30 June 2026, furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K on 4 August 2026, and our Earnings Release 3Q26, furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K on 27 October 2026.

Contacts

Enquiries relating to HSBC's strategy or operations may be directed to:

Alastair Ryan

Global Head of Investor Relations HSBC Holdings plc

8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ United Kingdom

Yafei Tian

Head of Asia Pacific Investor Relations

The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited 1 Queen's Road Central

Hong Kong

Telephone: +44 (0) 7468 703 010 Telephone: +852 2899 8909

Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

Greg Case

Head of Fixed Income Investor Relations HSBC Holdings plc

8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7992 3825 Email: [email protected]

HSBC Holdings plc

8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ United Kingdom

Telephone: 44 020 7991 8888 https://www.hsbc.com

Incorporated in England and Wales with limited liability Registration number 617987

HSBC Holdings PLC on 6ix

Earlier from HSBC

Later from HSBC

All HSBC news releases