Swiss Re Ag · SIX:SREN

Swiss Re — Investor Presentation (2016)

39 slides from Swiss Re's investor presentation, 2016

  1. Slide 1: From vending machines to global finance machines

    From vending machines to global finance machines

  2. Slide 2: What are smart contracts?

    What are smart contracts?  Definition #1: a machine programmed with rules we could have defined in a contract; instead machine performs or verifies performance

  3. Slide 3: What are smart contracts?

    What are smart contracts?  #2: two parties agree to run software between them, or one party and the blockchain  #3: long-lived blockchain process that handles money & blockchain-titled assets  “distributed application” or “fiduciary process”

  4. Slide 4: Tech often challenges legal categories

    Tech often challenges legal categories • “UberCab” vs. ride-sharing • Bitcoin: currency or commodity? • Vaping: smoker or non- smoker? • “Are smart contracts enforceable”? Is that even a meaningful question?

  5. Slide 5: Relationship between smart contracts and traditional law

    Relationship between smart contracts and traditional law • A smart contract, like the repo man, is a security protocol that controls the burden of lawsuit • If “possession is 9/10 of the law”, then a cross-border, blockchain-based financial smart contract may be 99%+ of the law • Do smart contracts

  6. Slide 6: Smart vs. traditional contracts

    Smart vs. traditional contracts  Traditional contract: verbal  text on paper  text on computer – wet code interpreted by brain  Smart contract: rules / conditions analyzed & executed, as in vending machine -- dry code interpreted by machine  Some dry rules are more like rules from property, cor

  7. Slide 7: Fiduciary (trusted) vs. fiduciary process (smart contract)

    Fiduciary (trusted) vs. fiduciary process (smart contract) If the public blockchain has the money, it has to treat it according to its rules

  8. Slide 8: Why smart contracts?

    Why smart contracts?  Secure a wide variety of desiderata  Costs of trust and security  Especially keen across borders: different languages, laws, jurisdictions  Security = vulnerability minimization = trust minimization  e.g. a financial transaction that minimizes need to trust human instituti

  9. Slide 9: Trusted strangers are security holes

    Trusted strangers are security holes • Tempting in security protocol design, but it’s a cheat: “And then a miracle occurs” • Must be plugged by highly evolved institution or blockchain  Minimize trust assumptions

  10. Slide 10: You can trust me; do we really need a contract?

    YOU CAN TRUST ME; DO WE REALLY NEED A CONTRACT? WEEKLYDESIGNGRIND Sos b 5

  11. Slide 11: Decentralization is more automated and secure than traditional security

    Decentralization per computer science is much more automated & secure than traditional security Computer Science

  12. Slide 12: Centralization is insecure

    Centralization is insecure

  13. Slide 13: Insecurity drives up costs and gets you stuck inside national silos

    Insecurity drives up costs and gets you stuck inside national silos Biggest reason traditional finance is stuck inside national silos: it depends on governments for its security. "We appreciate the strong #JPMorgan Hack — Three Men partnership with law enforcement Charged in Biggest Bank Hack in bri

  14. Slide 14: Public and global

    Public and global Bitcoin Ethereum

  15. Slide 15: Decentralization is more automated and secure than traditional security

    Decentralization per computer science is much more automated & secure than traditional security Computer Science

  16. Slide 16: Diversity -> Independence -> Less Likelihood of Collusion

    Diversity -> Independence -> Less Likelihood of Collusion

  17. Slide 17: Geopolitical insecurity (example: gold)

    Geopolitical insecurity (example: gold)

  18. Slide 18: Geopolitically insecure finance

    Geopolitically insecure finance  Russian holdings of Treasury bonds  Goldman Sachs collateral for DRs etc. between U.S. and Russia: $100s of millions  Visa & Mastercard for credit card clearing between U.S. and Russia : $100s of millions  Off on technicality: Argentine debt default

  19. Slide 19: Global Finance Machines

    Global Finance Machines Security that: • Doesn’t depend on politics, jurisdiction, or law • Works seamlessly across borders: same rules in Albania and Zimbabwe, Estonia and Venezuela, China and the United States Examples: • Bitcoin: geopolitically secure currency • secure asset registry / title tran

  20. Slide 20: Global Financial Machines

    Global Financial Machines Ethereum Network Nodes Nodes seen during the last 24 hours (Total: 394 Nodes) @ AlethOne © AlethZero © eth Geth © Gsoil © pyethapp

  21. Slide 21: Examples and patterns

    Examples and patterns  Dispute mediation  “Oracles”: input from the fallible world  Assurance contracts  Thought experiment: insurance

  22. Slide 22: Dispute Mediation

    Dispute Mediation  2-of-3 multisig transaction between  2 parties  escrow/mediator

  23. Slide 23: Oracles: input from the fallible world

    “Oracles”: input from the fallible world  On-chain programs can check for some obvious kinds of fraud and error  Traditional source of fiduciary data:  Birth and death certificates  Stock prices  Cryptography can protect integrity of transmission from source to blockchain  Fraud usually happen

  24. Slide 24: Pools & assurance contracts

    Pools & assurance contracts  e.g. Kickstarter  Many parties send transactions to on- blockchain pool  Blockchain code keeps track of total  When total > threshold  funds distributed to beneficiary  Expires without total > threshold  funds sent back to donors

  25. Slide 25: Could it be the lawyers that will be replaced by the robots?

    Could it be the lawyers that will be replaced by the robots?

  26. Slide 26: Thought experiment: let's try to replace the insurance industry

    Thought experiment: let’s try to replace the insurance industry  Insured pays into blockchain pool  Insured makes claim  Claims adjuster(s) decide whether claim is valid & amount of damages  damages released from pool to customer  Benefits:  Public / transparent / auditable  Payments works se

  27. Slide 27: Problems with "smart insurance"

    Problems with “smart insurance”  Problems:  Trustworthiness of & law governing claims adjusters  Who sets rates & based on what actuarial criteria (underwriting)  How are claims adjusters paid

  28. Slide 28: Underwriting: subjective (more wet than dry)?

    Underwriting: subjective (more wet than dry)?

  29. Slide 29: Claims adjustment: more wet than dry

    Claims adjustment: more wet than dry

  30. Slide 30: Interpretation & complexity

    Interpretation & complexity  Dry code –> harsh results in presence of unanticipated exceptions  Anticipating edge cases:  More conditions  more complicated dry code (software) & more reliance on fallible external data  Fewer conditions  more role for human mediators  more bias, whim, corrupti

  31. Slide 31: Wet (traditional K) vs. dry (smart K) code

    Wet (traditionnal K) vs. dry (smart K) code Law Software Logic grounds subjective boolean logic, on minds, bits analogy Security contempt/impr replication + isonment cryptography Predictability flexible rigid Maturity highly evolved larval / few / many cases experiences

  32. Slide 32: Wet (traditional K) vs. dry (smart K) code

    Wet (traditional K) vs. dry (smart K) code Law Software Area jurisdictional (on blockchain) silos independence from financial & political institutions & seamless operation across borders Costs lawsuits: extremely low expensive

  33. Slide 33: Lessons from our thought experiment

    Lessons from our thought experiment  To take best advantage of blockchain, we need to use best of blockchain tech (public blockchains) with best of traditional finance (claims adjustors, stable investments, etc.)  Finance industry people who want to operate with crippled blockchains (private block

  34. Slide 34: aiiiliitth

    aiiiliitth fl \ 5 ae “They presented us with an ironclad contract that we were able to totally reinterpret.”

  35. Slide 35: Lessons from our thought experiment

    Lessons from our thought experiment  Smart contracts on blockchain provide plumbing for financial aspects of service which can seamlessly cross trust boundaries (e.g. national borders)  Smart contracts don’t solve “wet” problems (e.g. claims adjustment & estimating risks -> setting fees)

  36. Slide 36: Simplification?

    Simplification?

  37. Slide 37: Conclusion

    Conclusion  Vending machine  global finance machine  Wet vs. dry code  Simplification?

  38. Slide 38: Nick Szabo

    Nick Szabo [email protected]

  39. Slide 39: Basic Copyright Notice & Disclaimer

    Basic Copyright Notice & Disclaimer ©2016 This presentation is copyright protected. All rights reserved. You may download or print out a hard copy for your private or internal use. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation without the prior written permiss

Swiss Re — Investor Presentation (2016) on 6ix