Altria Group, Inc. · NYSE:MO

Altria — CORESTA Smoke-Techno Conference 2019

26 slides from Altria's conference presentation, October 2019

  1. Slide 1: HPHC Market Map Study for US Machine-Made Cigars – Part 2 Predictive Modeling

    HPHC Market Map Study for US Machine-Made Cigars – Part 2 Predictive Modeling Michael J. Morton, Karl A. Wagner, Raquel M. Olegario, Lara L. Baker, Jennifer H. Smith CORESTA Smoke-Techno Conference 6-10 October 2019 Hamburg, Germany Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | COR

  2. Slide 2: Study Overview

    Study Overview ▪ Part 1: market map overview1 • Discuss the inherent variability of cigars • Describe the products • Present physical properties and abbreviated HPHCs for filler and smoke under CORESTA, ISO and Intense smoking regimes • Compare the physical properties and HPHC variability of cigars

  3. Slide 3: Market mapping

    Market mapping ▪ Sampled 24 U.S. machine-made cigars • Diameter: 7.8 mm – 16 mm • Length: 95 mm – 158 mm • Product weight: 1.1 g – 8.0 g • 13 Untipped, 8 plastic / wood tipped, 3 filter tip • ~38 % market share for cigarillos • ~11 % market share for filter tips ▪ Products tested for smoke and fille

  4. Slide 4: Objectives

    Objectives ▪ Compare three different smoking regimes: CORESTA, ISO, Intense ▪ Examine correlations of TPM, Tar, and CO to smoke constituent yields and effect on market mapping prediction intervals ▪ Examine cigar filler manufacturing variability Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client S

  5. Slide 5: Comparison of Smoking Regimes

    Comparison of Smoking Regimes ▪ Short-term relative standard deviations (rep-to-rep variation) ▪ Overall yield comparisons ▪ Consistency of constituent smoke yield orderings • Are the relative rankings close to the same for the different smoking regimes? Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria

  6. Slide 6: Smoke Chemistry Variability Comparison

    Smoke Chemistry Variability Comparison ▪ Smoking regimes: CORESTA, ISO, Intense ▪ 18 constituents on FDA abbreviated constituent list plus tar and TPM ▪ 7 replicates for each product for each constituent for each regime ▪ Relative standard deviations were averaged across all 24 products for each con

  7. Slide 7: Relative variation (%) averaged across products, analytes

    Relative variation (%) averaged across 24 products, 20 analytes Cigars Analyte CORESTA ISO Intense 1-Aminonaphthalene 11.8 14.1 11.8 2-Aminonaphthalene 11.2 13.6 11.9 4-Aminobiphenyl 10.5 13.1 11.2 The short-term relative standard Acetaldehyde 10.9 9.3 8.4 deviations are comparable among the three A

  8. Slide 8: Measured diameter and associated CORESTA Puff Volume

    Measured diameter and associated CORESTA Puff Volume CORESTA CORESTA Diameter Puff Diameter Puff Product Product mm Volume mm Volume mL mL 1 10.7 20 13 10.7 20 2 12.7 22 14 15.7 34 3 10.7 20 15 9.4 20 4 9.6 20 16 10.4 20 5 9.6 20 17 10.4 20 6 9.6 20 18 10.6 20 7 9.5 20 19 10.3 20 8 7.9 20 20 7.9 20

  9. Slide 9: Overall tar yield comparison

    Overall tar yield comparison Generally Intense > ISO > CORESTA Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 9

  10. Slide 10: Yield ratios can be different for analytes

    Yield ratios can be different for analytes Ratio of Intense/CORESTA Ratio of ISO/CORESTA Similar to findings in cigarettes by Counts et al. Reg Tox Pharm 41 (2005) pp 185-227 Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 10

  11. Slide 11: Consistency of yield rankings

    Consistency of yield rankings Generally the rankings are consistent between the methods. Note most of these cigars had the same puff volume under  CORESTA and ISO correlation CORESTA. ■ CORESTA and Intense correlation ▲ ISO and Intense correlation Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Clien

  12. Slide 12: Objectives

    Objectives ▪ Compare three different smoking regimes: CORESTA, ISO, Intense ISO 20778 (Intense) ▪ Examine correlations of TPM, Tar, and CO to smoke constituent yields and effect on market mapping prediction intervals ▪ Examine cigar filler manufacturing variability Michael Morton | Regulatory Scienc

  13. Slide 13: Correlations between analyte and TPM, Tar, CO

    Correlations between analyte and TPM, Tar, CO Gas phase compounds often better correlated to CO. Particulate phase typically better correlated to tar or TPM.  TPM ■ Tar ▲ CO Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 13

  14. Slide 14: Prediction Intervals

    Prediction Intervals ▪ Common outputs from market maps or benchmarking studies are prediction intervals giving ranges within which future test results are expected to lie. • Commonly indexed by Tar, TPM, or CO • May incorporate filler analyte concentration Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altr

  15. Slide 15: Prediction Intervals Benzene in Smoke

    Prediction Intervals Benzene in Smoke Prediction interval Prediction interval Prediction intervals ignoring CO assuming CO=100 mg/cigar are narrower with knowledge of CO. The better the correlation of CO to the constituent yield, the more the narrowing. R2 = 0.84 Because of the variability of cigars

  16. Slide 16: Prediction Intervals NNN in Smoke

    Prediction Intervals NNN in Smoke R2 = 0.29 Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 16

  17. Slide 17: Tobacco NNN varies from product to product

    Tobacco NNN varies from product to product Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 17

  18. Slide 18: Alternative Model

    Alternative Model ▪ Intuitively, because of the large product-to-product NNN differences, one would expect the tobacco NNN to affect NNN smoke yields in addition to TPM ▪ Simple Model Incorporating TPM and Filler Analyte Concentration: 𝑁𝑁𝑁 = 𝑎 + 𝑏 𝑇𝑜𝑏𝑁𝑁𝑁 ∗ 𝑇𝑃𝑀 , where TobNNN is the…

  19. Slide 19: Prediction Intervals NNN in Smoke

    Prediction Intervals NNN in Smoke R2 = 0.84 Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 19

  20. Slide 20: Prediction Intervals

    Prediction Intervals ▪ The better the correlation, the narrower are the prediction intervals. ▪ The prediction intervals incorporating tobacco NNN concentration are roughly half the width of the intervals using TPM alone ▪ Because of the very high variation in cigar smoke yields, the prediction inte

  21. Slide 21: R2 Values Incorporating Tobacco Characteristics

    R2 Values Incorporating Tobacco Characteristics Tar or TPM Tar or TPM Smoke analyte Regime only and Tobacco The model for formaldehyde is NNN CORESTA 0.464 0.843 y=a + b1*Tar + b2*(TobAmm*Tar) (with TPM) ISO 0.293 0.842 Intense 0.511 0.871 (TPM not captured with carbonyls) NNK CORESTA 0.402 0.634 (w

  22. Slide 22: Objectives

    Objectives ▪ Compare three different smoking regimes: CORESTA, ISO, Intense ISO 20778 (Intense) ▪ Examine correlations of TPM, Tar, and CO to smoke constituent yields and effect on market mapping prediction intervals ▪ Examine cigar filler manufacturing variability Michael Morton | Regulatory Scienc

  23. Slide 23: Filler Temporal Variation

    Filler Temporal Variation ▪ Most products in this market map were tested twice for filler analytes • Some products from the same production batch and some from two different production batches Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 23

  24. Slide 24: Percentage Difference in Two NNN Filler Results

    Percentage Difference in Two NNN Filler Results This shows moderate differences when the same batch is tested at different times and often much larger differences when testing different batches Not available There was not enough of products 4, 5, and 6 remaining for filler re-testing Michael Morton

  25. Slide 25: Summary and Conclusions

    Summary and Conclusions ▪ Cigars are a more diverse product category than cigarettes ▪ All three smoking regimes gave similar levels of variability and generally ranked the smoke yields comparably ▪ Smoke yields can be benchmarked with prediction intervals using TPM, Tar, or CO yield, and, for some

  26. Slide 26: Questions?

    Thank You Questions? For copies of this presentation visit the Altria’s Science Website at www.altria.com/alcs-science Altria has a new Altria Science Twitter account Follow us @AltriaScience Michael Morton | Regulatory Sciences | Altria Client Services | CORESTA SSPT 6-10 October 2019 | ST37 26

Altria Group — CORESTA Smoke-Techno Conference 2019 on 6ix