Tennessee Valley Authority · NYSE:TVC
Tennessee Valley Authority — Investor Presentation (April 2015)
126 slides from Tennessee Valley Authority's investor presentation, Apr 8, 2015
Slide 1: Regional Resource Stewardship Council
Regional Resource Stewardship Council April 8 and 9, 2015 Muscle Shoals, Alabama
Slide 2: Safety First
Safety First Regional Resource Stewardship Council | 2
Slide 3: Agenda
Agenda 8:00 Welcome, Introduce New John Myers, Alternate Designated Federal Officer Members Avis Kennedy, Council Chair Agenda Review Lee Matthews, Facilitator 8:10 DFO Welcome and Meeting Myers Purpose, and TVA Board Update 8:20 FACA Briefing Kendra Mansur, Office of the General Counsel 8:35 DFO Br
Slide 4: The Federal Advisory Committee Act and The Regional Resource Stewardship Council
The Federal Advisory Committee Act and The Regional Resource Stewardship Council FACA Briefing—Eighth Term Kendra Mansur, Attorney Office of General Counsel
Slide 5: Historical Background on Advisory Committees
Historical Background on Advisory Committees -President George Washington sought the advice during the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794 -Growth in advisory committees occurred after WWII -Congressional concerns: • —Proliferation of committees • —Domination by special interest groups • —Lack of transparency
Slide 6: Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972
Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 • U.S. Congress formally recognized the merits of seeking advice and assistance • The Act assures that advisory committees provide advice that is relevant, objective and open to the public, and comply with record keeping requirements FACA Briefing—Eighth Term,
Slide 7: Advisory Committees Today
Advisory Committees Today • Play an important role in shaping programs and policies • 395 Million Spent by • Approximately 1000 All Agencies in 2011 committees with more than (Source GSA website) 60,000 members • Advise the President of the United States and the executive branch • Subject to FACA an
Slide 8: Key Elements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
Key Elements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act Public access • Meetings (reasonably accessible and timely notice required—generally open to the public) • Records (available for public inspection, subject to the Freedom of Information Act) Structured management • Filed charters • Expiration after
Slide 9: TVA's Regional Resource Stewardship Council
TVA’s Regional Resource Stewardship Council TVA’s stewardship activities include: — Operation of its dams and reservoirs — Navigation and flood control — Management of lands in TVA custody and control — Water quality — Wildlife Created by TVA “to provide advice on its stewardship — Recreation activi
Slide 10: Key Provisions of Council Charter
Key Provisions of Council Charter Council Provides Advice Balanced Membership Members include: • Nominations from the Governors • Advice reported to the within the Tennessee Valley states TVA Board’s External • Four representatives of local power companies of TVA power Relations Committee • One repr
Slide 11: RRSC Meeting Protocols
RRSC Meeting Protocols Agenda - Joe Hoagland, Vice President, Stakeholder Relations is the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) Alternate DFO: John Myers, Director, Environmental Policy & Performance - Agenda prepared and approved by the DFO in consultation with Council Chair, Avis Kennedy - Agenda dist
Slide 12: Thank you for your participation and advice
Thank you for your participation and advice.
Slide 13: DFO Briefing
DFO Briefing John Myers, Alternate Designated Federal Officer
Slide 14: River Management & Dam Safety Update
River Management & Dam Safety Update James Everett Manager, River Forecast Center Operations Support April 8, 2015
Slide 15: September 2014 Meeting Review
September 2014 Meeting Review • TVA’s Integrated Reservoir System • Reservoir Operating Policy History and Overview • 10 year Review of Policy Successes • Reservoir Operations During Climatic Extremes Senator George Norris River Management & Dam Safety Update | 15
Slide 16: Multi-Purpose Reservoir Operations
Multi-Purpose Reservoir Operations • Flood Damage Reduction • Navigation • Hydroelectric Generation • Water Supply • Water Quality • Recreation • Dam Safety River Management & Dam Safety Update | 16
Slide 17: Some Key Messages
Some Key Messages • The Reservoir Operations Study has provided for flexible operation of the system under various competing demands and challenging weather extremes • Council advised TVA to use this flexibility to continue to improve operational performance through adaptive management practices • E
Slide 18: Key Messages…continued
Key Messages…continued • Continued engagement through Social Media and other outlets • Releasing a spring online newsletter “River Neighbors” • Personal Outreach with Key Stakeholders, agricultural interests, marina owners, navigation industry, lake associations • Initiatives for FY16 include benchm
Slide 19: Reservoir System Update
Reservoir System Update Rainfall/Runoff • Tracking below normal CYTD Hydroelectric Generation • 87% of normal CYTD Flood Damage Reduction • Norris averts $62M at Clinton, TN • Coordination with TN Valley Farmers Recreation • Tributaries filling on target • River guide expo • Whitewater season underw
Slide 20: Dam Safety Update – Boone Dam
att Dam Safety Update — f Boone Dam
Slide 21: Boone Dam
Boone Dam River Management & Dam Safety Update | 21
Slide 22: Boone Dam
Boone Dam River Management & Dam Safety Update | 22
Slide 23: Sink Hole Discovery
Sink Hole Discovery River Management & Dam Safety Update | 23
Slide 24: Sink Hole Repair
Sink Hole Repair River Management & Dam Safety Update | 24
Slide 25: Seeping with Sediment
Seeping with Sediment River Management & Dam Safety Update | 25
Slide 26: Karst Geology
Karst Geology River Management & Dam Safety Update | 26
Slide 27: Boone Lake
Boone Lake Operating Range 1350 – 1355 Feet Above Sea Level About 30 feet lower than summer pool About 10 feet lower than winter pool River Management & Dam Safety Update | 27
Slide 28: Downstream
Downstream River Management & Dam Safety Update | 28
Slide 29: Drilling, Sub-surface Investigation, Instrumentation
Drilling, Sub-surface Investigation, Instrumentation River Management & Dam Safety Update | 29
Slide 30: Filter Installation
Filter Installation River Management & Dam Safety Update | 30
Slide 31: Filter Installation
Filter Installation River Management & Dam Safety Update | 31
Slide 32: River Management & Dam Safety Update | 32
River Management & Dam Safety Update | 32
Slide 33: Boone Dam Summary
Boone Dam Summary • Safety of downstream communities, industries and the public is the top priority • Keeping the lake at below normal levels reduces the risk to areas downstream of the dam • Modified water levels significantly impact the recreation benefits of Boone Reservoir, but do not affect the
Slide 34: More Information
More Information www.tva.gov/boonedrawdown www.facebook.com/TVA River Management & Dam Safety Update | 34
Slide 35: Dam Safety Update – Pickwick Dam
Dam Safety Update – Pickwick Dam
Slide 36: Pickwick Dam
Pickwick Dam River Management & Dam Safety Update | 36
Slide 37: Downstream
Downstream River Management & Dam Safety Update | 37
Slide 38: Key Differences vs. Boone
Key Differences vs. Boone • Newly performed seismic analysis (using newer technology and models) found poor performance of earthen portion of dam during extreme earthquake event • Downstream topography – Wide/flat floodway at Pickwick vs. narrow riverine sections below Boone • Both include interim r
Slide 39: Pickwick Dam Summary
Pickwick Dam Summary • Safety of downstream communities, industries and the public is the top priority • Pickwick Reservoir will return to normal summer lake levels on schedule by mid-April, dependent on rainfall • TVA is installing multiple layers of seismic detection equipment that will send a not
Slide 40: Questions?
TM Questions?
Slide 41: 2015 Integrated Resource Plan
2015 Integrated Resource Plan Overview of the Draft Results Spring 2015
Slide 42: The Future of Our Energy Supply
The Future of Our Energy Supply • TVA power will still be reliable, affordable and sustainable • We will rely more on cost‐effective energy efficiency • There will be more solar and wind power, and less coal • Natural gas will play a bigger role • TVA will continue to provide for economic growth in
Slide 43: Development Environment
TVA’s Mission is the Cornerstone Energy Environment IRP Development Economic 2015 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN | 43
Slide 44: Selected Scenarios and Strategies
Selected Scenarios and Strategies External Factors Shaping the Environment TVA’s Response & Portfolio Goals Scenarios Strategies 1 - Current Outlook A - The Reference Plan 2 - Stagnant Economy B - Meet an Emissions Target 3 - Growth Economy C - Focus on Long-Term, Market-Supplied Resources 4 - De-Ca
Slide 45: Key Criteria Used to Evaluate Strategy Performance
Key Criteria Used to Evaluate Strategy Performance Identifies long‐range and shorter term system costs Cost Financial Measures the uncertainty around the cost of various plans Risk Environmental Captures multiple measures related to the environmental “footprint” Stewardship Valley Measures per capit
Slide 46: The Generation Fleet Will Be Cleaner
The Generation Fleet Will Be Cleaner Potential Capacity Mix Under Current Planning Scenario Resource Types 2014 35 GW Nuclear 2033 – The Reference Plan Coal 43 GW Hydro 2033 – Meet an Emissions Target Non‐emitting Natural Gas sources 2033 – Focus on Market Supplied Resources account for Renewables 6
Slide 47: Purpose and Approach of the EIS
Purpose and Approach of the EIS • Decision‐makers informed of environmental impacts • Public involvement • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • System‐wide study of environmental impacts • Subsequent site‐specific studies 2015 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN | 47
Slide 48: Annual CO2 Emissions by Strategy
CO2 Emissions Typical of Study Trends CO2 Emissions by Alternative Strategy 80 Annual CO2 Emissions, million tons No Action 70 A 60 B 50 C 40 D E 30 Note: Strategy B 20 emissions are the same as Strategy A Strategies C ‐ Focus on Long‐Term Market A - The Reference Plan B ‐ Meet an Emissions Target D
Slide 49: Getting To A Recommendation
Getting To A Recommendation Cost of Reliability Portfolio Power Mix Keeping electricity Maintaining Seeking a balanced affordable availability of supply portfolio that and ability to minimizes risk and deliver diversifies resources 2015 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN | 49
Slide 50: Next Steps
Next Steps • Complete public comment period and take input into consideration in final analysis • Complete sensitivity case analysis to better understand resource mix choices • Identify target power supply mix and recommend to Board • Release final IRP and SEIS reports Inputs & Analyze & Present Re‐
Slide 51: Comment Period March 13 – April 27, 2015
Comment Period March 13 – April 27, 2015 March 19 Chattanooga, TN April 15 Memphis, TN April 6 Knoxville, TN April 21 Nashville, TN April 9 Huntsville, AL April 22 Bowling Green, KY April 14 Tupelo, MS Meeting Time: 7:00 – 8:30 PM local time 2015 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN | 51
Slide 52: IVA
IVA
Slide 53: Advice Topic and Questions
Advice Topic and Questions • What standards (safety, environmental or other) for floating houses should be highest priority if a future management strategy is developed? • In your opinion, which management alternative(s) could most effectively address the issues at hand? • Should TVA charge a fee to
Slide 54: BREAK TIME
BREAK TIME
Slide 55: Stewardship Update - Introduction
Stewardship Update - Introduction Rebecca Tolene Vice President, Natural Resources and Real Property Services
Slide 56: Natural Resource Plan Annual Update
Natural Resource Plan Annual Update Tina Guinn Manager, Programs and Planning
Slide 57: What is the Natural Resource Plan (NRP)?
What is the Natural Resource Plan (NRP)? The NRP is a high level strategy for responsible management of natural and cultural resources over the next 20 years The NRP is designed to: • Integrate the objectives of six resource areas • Provide optimum public use benefits • Balance competing and sometim
Slide 58: Where are we?
Where are we? A Moment to Advance After three years of implementation, the Natural Resource Plan (NRP) is slated to move from Phase I to Phase II. Is TVA Ready? Has TVA fulfilled the Keys to Success in Phase I (years one to three) sufficiently to move into Phase II (years four and five)? Yes. From t
Slide 59: Key: Expand data management and information sharing opportunities
Key: Expand data management and information sharing opportunities • ATLAS • Integration of all data to one system • Cultural Database • Three year project to build system • Data sharing abilities with tribes, universities and state/federal agencies • Public access to Stream Monitoring data • New Map
Slide 60: Key: Gain a better understanding of the resource base and current condition
Key: Gain a better understanding of the resource base and current condition. • Land Condition Assessments (LCA) • Forest Roads 25% Good • Dispersed Recreation 15% Poor • Trails 47% • Natural Areas Monitoring 53% Complete • Recreation Inventory Incomplete 60% Fair • Cultural Resource Surveys • Stream
Slide 61: Key: Develop and maintain partnerships to support implementation efforts
Key: Develop and maintain partnerships to support implementation efforts. TVA looks for partnerships that • Support NRP programs • Fill a gap where a good project may not happen without assistance • Elk River • Bear Creek • Involve volunteers and local communities • Bring many groups together NRP AN
Slide 62: Key: Strengthen integration between resource areas during implementation
Key: Strengthen integration between resource areas during implementation. Honeycomb Trail Project Required cultural review prompted staff to use annual survey funding for trail and surrounding area; information will be used for interpretive signage. NARP ANNUAL UPDATE | 62
Slide 63: Key: Strengthen integration between resource areas during implementation
Key: Strengthen integration between resource areas during implementation. Magnetic Gradiometer Ground Penetrating Radar Sandhill Cranes Hiwassee Island Project NARP ANNUAL UPDATE | 63
Slide 64: Key: Establish a NRP assessment process and metrics to measure results
Key: Establish a NRP assessment process and metrics to measure results. FYTD FY15 Goals ‐ February Status Threshold Target Stretch Comments Actual Complete percentage of NRM Stewardship Program Projects as 8 of 58 Completed; Project total 14% On Target 95% 97% 100% approved by the pre‐PAB (include P
Slide 65: Key: Establish a NRP assessment process and metrics to measure results
Key: Establish a NRP assessment process and metrics to measure results FY15 Goals ‐ February FYTD Actual Status Threshold Target Stretch Comments Commercial operations site assessments completed for 51 of 52 targeted 98% On Target 80% 90% 100% security assurance assessments completed. Operational co
Slide 66: Key: Begin adapting reservoir land plans
Key: Begin adapting reservoir land plans Lands Planning Schedule FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Kentucky Reservoir NRP Refresh Wheeler Reservoir Chickamauga Reservoir Nickajack Reservoir Wilson Reservoir Normandy Reservoir Great Falls Reservoir Fort Loudoun Reservoir Draft NEPA Publ
Slide 67: www.tva.gov
www.tva.gov NRP ANNUAL REPORT | 67
Slide 68: What we're doing
What we're doing Plants and Wildlife Protecting Our Heritage Bigger Weekend Learn about TVA’s Lands Find out what TVA is Learn how TVA helps to Read about TVA's Read how TVA is clean water initiatives. Find out what TVA is doing to protect preserve remnants of outreach and education working to enhan
Slide 69: Our Partners
Our Partners From state wildlife agencies helping us provide access to hunters and fishers, to county and city partners developing public access along the water, to local organizations committed to natural resource enhancement and protection, our partners are important. We rely on dozens of partners
Slide 70: Stewardship Activities
Stewardship Activities Rebecca Hayden Morgan Natural Resource Management East Region
Slide 71: Enhancing Communication
Enhancing Communication FY15 Stewardship book Additional visitors centers open with BVI River Neighbors publication – Mid-April Tennessee River Adventures Generated YTD 24 (+) positive news stories External website enhancements Social media RRSC April 2015 | 71
Slide 72: As Part of TVA's Mission….
As Part of TVA’s Mission…. | 72
Slide 73: Stewards of the Valley's Resources
Stewards of the Valley’s Resources | 73
Slide 74: Who, What, and Where
Who, What, and Where Outreach Event Water Quality 51 Clean Up ADA Access Pier Partner Types Project Location 12 4% 11 Ramp Forestry/Wildlife Habitat Parking Stabilization Campground | Informal Recreation Access Trail ww Alabama J Georgia w City lm County la Kentucky @ Mississippi a State i Federal @
Slide 75: Aligning Interests: Public Engagement
Aligning Interests: Public Engagement 3 Major Public Outreach Days Clean up events including Living Lands & Waters Barge Tour Education and Outreach programs Volunteer Program TVA Science Kids Citizen Science: Discover Life in America River Works Discovery Children’s World Water Monitoring Sho
Slide 76: VIDEO
VIDEO | 76
Slide 77: BREAK TIME
BREAK TIME — % Se. = 2 * 4
Slide 78: Floating Houses
Floating Houses James Adams Matthew Higdon Holly Oswalt
Slide 79: Floating Houses: TVA Concerns
Floating Houses TVA Concerns • Residential-type proposals on water • Structures presented as houseboats but designed and used primarily for habitation at a fixed location • Need to clarify or update regulations with changing times • Owner/public/investor expectations Floating Houses | 79
Slide 80: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Examples: Nonnavigables - Manufactured Houseboats - Floating Houses Floating Houses | 80
Slide 81: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Residential-Type Use / Harbor Limits Floating Houses | 81
Slide 82: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Disposal and Removal from Reservoir January 2011 – Moored in Marina April 2013 – Report from Stakeholder Floating Houses | 82
Slide 83: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Disposal and Removal from Reservoir April 2013 – Report from Stakeholder July 2013 – TVA Cleans up – Approximate Cost $7,000 Floating Houses | 83
Slide 84: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Electrical Supply Floating Houses | 84
Slide 85: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Anchoring Floating Houses | 85
Slide 86: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Anchoring Floating Houses | 86
Slide 87: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Sewage Disposal (black water and grey water) Floating Houses | 87
Slide 88: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Chronology – How we got here • Section 26a of the TVA Act of 1933 requires that no dam, appurtenant works, or other obstruction affecting navigation, flood control, or public lands or reservations shall be constructed, operated, or maintained across, along, or in the Tennessee River
Slide 89: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Chronology – How we got here • In 1977, TVA amended 26a regulations to prohibit all new nonnavigable houseboats except for those in existence before February 15, 1978. A nonnavigable houseboat under TVA rules means any houseboat not compliant with 5 criteria regarding navigability, s
Slide 90: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Chronology – How we got here • Owners of many structures installed a small motor and steering mechanism, and displayed a state boat registration number in an attempt to meet the criteria for navigability under TVA rules. • Norris and Fontana Reservoirs saw the most growth in floating
Slide 91: Floating Houses
Floating Houses RRSC Feedback October 13, 2011, and September 24, 2014, presentations to RRSC resulted in advice and guidance for TVA to consider as highlighted below: • Establish a policy regarding privately-owned floating houses. • Work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, other agencies, distri
Slide 92: Floating Houses
Floating Houses RRSC Feedback • Contemplate a range of management approaches ---- e.g., prohibiting; how to handle future expansion; feasibility of floating subdivisions; not restricting structures in a marina slip. • Determine required resources to safely manage if allowed, and whether management o
Slide 93: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Steps Taken • In early 2014, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review was initiated to directly address issues and determine how to better manage floating houses. • Interagency work team established and collaborating with TVA Tennessee Department of Environment and Conserv
Slide 94: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Steps Taken • Face-to-face meetings held with the marina owners and distributors most affected. • Range of management alternatives analyzed through the NEPA process incorporating guidance and concerns expressed by the RRSC. Floating Houses | 94
Slide 95: Floating Houses
Floating Houses NEPA Review • TVA is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to determine the future policy for managing floating houses and nonnavigable houseboats. • A Notice of Intent was published in the Federal Register April 30, 2014, to conduct an environmental review. • A 90-day pu
Slide 96: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Scoping Issues Prevalent scoping comments and issues: • Safety of electrical, mooring, and anchoring systems • Water quality: proper management of black water and grey water • Need stronger regulation, policing, enforcement • Need minimum safety and environmental standards with regul
Slide 97: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Update • The NEPA review is programmatic in nature and applies to all TVA reservoirs. • A draft EIS is being completed to analyze six management alternatives. • The draft is expected to be ready for release and public comment by June 2015. • A 90-day public comment period is plan
Slide 98: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives • No Action Alternative – Current Management • Alternative A – Allow Existing and New Floating Houses • Alternative B1 – Grandfather Existing and Prohibit New • Alternative B2 – Grandfather but Sunset Existing and Prohibit New • Alternative C – Prohibit Ne
Slide 99: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives No Action Alternative – Current Management • TVA would continue to use discretion in enforcing its Section 26a regulations. Current regulations would not be updated and TVA would continue to rely on 18 CFR 1304, Subpart B: Regulation of Nonnavigable Houseb
Slide 100: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives Alternative B1 – Grandfather Existing and Prohibit New • Approve existing floating houses that meet minimum standards and allow mooring within permitted marina harbor limits. Nonnavigable houseboats approved by TVA prior to February 15, 1978, and compliant
Slide 101: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives Alternative B2 – Grandfather but Sunset Existing and Prohibit New • Approve existing floating houses that meet minimum standards and allow mooring within permitted marina harbor limits. Establish a sunset date (30 years) when all floating houses and nonnav
Slide 102: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives Alternative C – Prohibit New and Remove Unpermitted • Prohibit new and existing unpermitted floating houses built primarily for human habitation rather than navigation or transportation. Continue to allow nonnavigable houseboats approved by TVA prior to Fe
Slide 103: Floating Houses
Floating Houses EIS Management Alternatives Alternative D – Enforce Current Regulations and Manage through Marinas and Permits • Enforce current TVA Section 26a regulations related to nonnavigable houseboats and manage the proliferation of floating houses indirectly through marina land use agreement
Slide 104: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Alternatives – More Explanation • Under the No Action/Current Management Alternative and Alternative D, regulations and standards would not be updated. Floating houses could meet the criteria for navigability in Section 26a rules (18 CFR 1304.101). • Under Alternative C, TVA regulati
Slide 105: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Requirements Applied to Alternatives A, B1, B2 • Ground fault protection not exceeding 100 milliamperes at main marina feeder circuit, branch circuits, structure, or individual circuits. • Protect exposed electrical cables where feasible by trenching or placing in cable trays or cond
Slide 106: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Requirements Applied to Alternatives A, B1, B2 • Treat grey water and black water through Marine Sanitation Device (MSD) on Discharge Reservoirs. • No expansion of existing structures allowed unless TVA deems essential for compliance with standards (such as additional holding tank ca
Slide 107: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Requirements Applied to Alternatives A, B1, B2 • If new floating houses are allowed (Alternative A ), maximum size 1,000 square feet and 1 story; moored in marina slip with all utilities connected to slip. • TVA considers exchange and retirement of one or more permitted nonnavigable
Slide 108: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Requirements Applied to Alternatives A, B1, B2 • At TVA’s request, marinas/owners provide records to document holding tanks on No Discharge Reservoirs are being pumped regularly and waste is properly disposed and treated. • Nonnavigable houseboats must be in compliance with current T
Slide 109: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Next Steps • Complete the draft EIS for release and conduct public meetings during the 90-day comment period. Meeting locations: LaFollette, TN; Bryson City, NC; Kingsport, TN; Parsons, TN. • Current plans also include streaming one public session during the comment period. • Issue f
Slide 110: Floating Houses
Floating Houses For Information - How To Be Involved • Visit TVA website: www.tva.gov/floatinghouses/index.htm • Attend public meetings • Provide written comments via website, public meetings, or by mail • Invite TVA to meet with your group or association • Invite TVA to visit your site or facility
Slide 111: Questions?
Questions? Floating Houses | 111
Slide 112: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Designed and Used for Navigation or Habitation? Floating Houses | 112
Slide 113: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Locations of Floating Houses and Public Meetings Floating Houses | 113
Slide 114: Lunch and Adjourn for Field Trip
Lunch and Adjourn for Field Trip
Slide 115: Regional Resource Stewardship Council
Regional Resource Stewardship Council April 8 and 9, 2015 Muscle Shoals, Alabama
Slide 116: Agenda
Agenda 8:00 Welcome and Recap Myers / Matthews 8:15 Discussion and Initial Advice Matthews / Council 9:00 Public Comment Period Matthews 10:00 Break 10:15 Council Discussion and Matthews / Council Advice 11:30 Wrap Up and Adjourn Kennedy/Hoagland 12:00 Lunch Regional Resource Stewardship Council 116
Slide 117: Recap from Day 1
Recap from Day 1 John Myers Alternate DFO
Slide 118: Floating Houses
Floating Houses Designed and Used for Navigation or Habitation? Floating Houses 118
Slide 119: Council Discussion and Initial Advice
Council Discussion and Initial Advice
Slide 120: Advice Topic and Questions
Advice Topic and Questions • What standards (safety, environmental or other) for floating houses should be highest priority if a future management strategy is developed? • In your opinion, which management alternative(s) could most effectively address the issues at hand? • Should TVA charge a fee to
Slide 121: Public Comment Period
Public Comment Period • Public participation is appreciated • This is a listening session; responses are typically not provided
Slide 122: BREAK TIME
BREAK TIME
Slide 123: Council Discussion and Advice
Council Discussion and Advice
Slide 124: Advice Topic and Questions
Advice Topic and Questions • What standards (safety, environmental or other) for floating houses should be highest priority if a future management strategy is developed? • In your opinion, which management alternative(s) could most effectively address the issues at hand? • Should TVA charge a fee to
Slide 125: Wrap Up and Adjourn
TM Wrap Up and Adjourn
Slide 126: Thank you and please travel safely!
Thank you and please travel safely!
Tennessee Valley Authority — Investor Presentation (April 2015) on 6ix