Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited · ASX:NEU

Neuren Pharmaceuticals — 6th Annual TBI Conference, Washington DC (May 2016)

34 slides from Neuren Pharmaceuticals's conference presentation, May 13, 2016

  1. Slide 1: INTREPID: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of NNZ-2566 in TBI

    INTREPID: INvestigating TREatments for the Prevention of secondary Injury and Disability following TBI For personal use only A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of NNZ-2566 in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury 6th Annual TBI Conference, Washington DC 12 May 2016

  2. Slide 2: Disclosures

    Disclosures For personal use only • The INTREPID study was funded by Neuren Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and by grants from the U.S. Army Medical Research & Materiel Command (W81XWH-09-1-0496 and W81XWH-08-2-0014). • Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the presenter and a

  3. Slide 3: Trofinetide (NNZ-2566)

    Trofinetide (NNZ-2566) For personal use only

  4. Slide 4: Primary and Secondary Objectives

    4 Primary and Secondary Objectives For personal use only  Primary: Evaluate safety and tolerability • AEs through 1 month (4-6 wks) or discharge • SAEs through 3 months (12-14 wks) • C-SSRS: Suicidality assessed at discharge or at 1 and 3 months using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale  Se

  5. Slide 5: Exploratory Objectives

    5 Exploratory Objectives For personal use only – Biologic Activity/Efficacy • Improvement in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning at 1 month (4-6 wks) and 3 months (12-14 wks): TMT Grooved CPT-II Trail Making Test Peg Board Conner’s Continuous Performance Test II POMS RPSQ RBANS Profile of R

  6. Slide 6: Exploratory Objectives (continued)

    6 Exploratory Objectives (continued) For personal use only – Pharmacokinetics (PK): • Blood concentration of NNZ-2566 in patients with TBI when administered as a 10 minute bolus followed by a 72 hour maintenance infusion at 1, 3 or 6 mg/kg/h – Explore the relationship between PK and: • Biomarker tra

  7. Slide 7: Study Design & Dose Escalation

    7 Study Design & Dose Escalation For personal use only Loading Maintenance Total Active: Cohort N Dose Dose Dose Placebo 20 mg/kg 1 mg/kg/hr 1 30 92 mg/kg 2:1 (10–minute infusion) for 72 hr --- DSMC Review --- 20 mg/kg 3 mg/kg/hr 2 30 236 mg/kg 2:1 (10–minute infusion) for 72 hr --- DSMC Review ---

  8. Slide 8: Composite Baseline Severity Score (CBSS)

    8 Composite Baseline Severity Score (CBSS) For personal use only  TBI clinical outcomes are associated with severity of patient condition at baseline as measured by various parameters predictive of outcomes.  Baseline measures are not available for GOS-E and MPAI-4.  CBSS was calculated as a comp

  9. Slide 9: Analysis Populations by Cohort & Treatment

    9 Analysis Populations by Cohort & Treatment For personal use only Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 All Analysis Not Population Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Treated Total 10 20 11 17 63 130 10 261 ITT (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) 10 20 11 17 63 130 251 mITT (100%) (100%

  10. Slide 10: Baseline Patient Characteristics: PA-GOSE

    10 Baseline Patient Characteristics: PA-GOSE by Cohort & Treatment For personal use only Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Total N 9 19 11 17 57 114 227 Sex: M 9 (100%) 19 (100%) 11 (100%) 17 (100%) 52 (91%) 92 (82%) 201 (89%) F 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (9%

  11. Slide 11: Baseline CBSS Components (PA-GOSE)

    11 Baseline CBSS Components (PA-GOSE) by Cohort & Treatment Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 For personal use only Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Total N 9 19 11 17 57 114 227 GCS Mean 7.0 7.8 6.4 6.8 7.6 7.0 7.2 Median 7.0 8.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 N 9 19 11 17 57 114 227 GFAP Mean 7018.47 65

  12. Slide 12: Baseline CBSS Components (PA-MPAI)

    12 Baseline CBSS Components (PA-MPAI) by Cohort & Treatment Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 For personal use only Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Total N 8 19 10 15 50 97 199 GCS Mean 7.0 7.8 6.5 7.1 7.6 7.2 7.3 Median 7.0 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 N 8 19 10 15 50 97 199 GFAP Mean 7608.29 6576

  13. Slide 13: Baseline CBSS by Dichotomized 3 month GOS-E

    13 For personal use only GOS-E (5-8) GOS-E (1-4) Favorable Unfavorable Baseline CBSS by Dichotomized 3 month GOS-E (PA-GOSE)

  14. Slide 14: Baseline CBSS by Treatment Cohort (PA-GOSE)

    14 Baseline CBSS by Treatment Cohort 3 (PA-GOSE) For personal use only Placebo Active

  15. Slide 15: Summary of top-line safety and efficacy results

    Summary of top-line safety and efficacy results For personal use only  No treatment-related or dose-dependent trends in adverse events or laboratory results  No significant difference between active and placebo assessed by the 3 core efficacy measures: GOS-E, MPAI- 4 and survival – Overall and wit

  16. Slide 16: GOS-E, MPAI-4 and RBANS at 3 months

    GOS-E, MPAI-4 and RBANS at 3 months Primary Analysis Populations (PA) Cohort 3 Adjusted for CBSS For personal use only GOS-E MPAI-4 RBANS Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active N 32 56 29 51 27 44 CBSS < median LSmean 5.6 5.4 23.0 31.6 81.5 81.0 SE 0.38 0.29 5.33 4.01 2.55 2.00 Median 6.0 6.0

  17. Slide 17: Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs

    17 Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs (ITT Population) For personal use only Treatment Emergent AEs Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Total * Reported at 10 20 10 15 54 102 211 least one (100%) (100%) (91%) (88%) (86%) (78%) (81%) event Treatment Emerg

  18. Slide 18: Incidence of Out of Range ECG Parameters

    18 Incidence of Out of Range ECG Parameters (ITT Population) For personal use only Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 QTc>450ms Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Total * 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 Screening (5%) (2%) (1%) QTc>480ms 1 2 3 Day 1-2 (2%) (2%) (1%) 1 1 2 Day 2-3 (2%) (<1%) (<1%) 1 4 5 Day 3-4 (2%)

  19. Slide 19: Difference in drug distribution in Fragile X Syndrome and TBI Patients

    Difference in drug distribution in Fragile X Syndrome and TBI Patients For personal use only Bodyweight (kg) Central Volume (L) Clearance (L/h) Cmax (µg/mL) Fragile X TBI Fragile X TBI Fragile X TBI Fragile X TBI 35 70 1 3 6 35 70 1 3 6 35 70 1 3 6 35 70 1 3 6 mg/kg mg/kg/h mg/kg mg/kg/h mg/kg mg/kg

  20. Slide 20: Effect of body weight on exposure

    Effect of body weight on exposure For personal use only

  21. Slide 21: Pharmacokinetic conclusions

    21 Pharmacokinetic conclusions For personal use only • NNZ-2566 showed linear pharmacokinetics across the dose range evaluated in TBI patients • No accumulation, metabolic inhibition or induction was observed during the course of treatment • Body weight has a significant effect on clearance and volu

  22. Slide 22: PK/PD Analysis

    22 PK/PD Analysis For personal use only • Hypotheses: • Exposure to NNZ-2566 (dose, duration or both) was not sufficient to demonstrate clinical benefit vs. placebo • Noise level at baseline due to highly variable severity impacted treatment effect detection • Methodology: evaluate high dose treatme

  23. Slide 23: PK/PD Analysis Details

    23 PK/PD Analysis Details For personal use only • For high dose group, evaluate association between GOS-E, MPAI4, and RBANS and AUC stratified by baseline severity (CBSS) • Descriptive evaluation • Selected quantitative evaluation • For RBANS responders evaluate relationship between RBANS, GOS-E, an

  24. Slide 24: 3 Month GOS-E vs. AUC

    24 3 Month GOS-E vs. AUC Cohort 3 - Active (PA-GOSE) For personal use only 8 GOS-E 3 Month 7 6 5 4 3 2 <=median CBSS >median CBSS 1 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 AUC Note: For subjects alive at 3 months. Excludes GOS-E of 1 (dead).

  25. Slide 25: 3 Month MPAI-4 vs. AUC

    25 3 Month MPAI-4 vs. AUC Cohort 3 - Active (PA-MPAI) For personal use only 80 <=median CBSS 70 >median CBSS 60 MPAI-4 3 Month 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 AUC

  26. Slide 26: 3 Month RBANS vs. AUC

    26 3 Month RBANS vs. AUC Cohort 3 – Active PA (RBANS) For personal use only 110 105 100 95 RBANS 3 Month 90 85 80 75 70 65 <=median CBSS >median CBSS 60 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 AUC

  27. Slide 27: GOS-E: Analysis Adjusted for AUC and CBSS

    27 GOS-E: Analysis Adjusted for AUC and CBSS For personal use only • The mean treatment effect versus placebo evaluated for high dose at 1 month • If not adjusted for AUC and CBSS p=0.96 • When adjusted for AUC and CBSS • High dose 4.3 vs. 2.5 on placebo • p= 0.14 • Significance of each covariate in

  28. Slide 28: 3 Month RBANS vs. 3 Month GOS-E

    28 3 Month RBANS vs. 3 Month GOS-E Cohort 3 – Active RBANS Responder PA (RBANS) For personal use only 115 110 105 RBANS 3 Month 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GOS-E 3 Month Values

  29. Slide 29: 3 Month RBANS vs. 3 Month MPAI-4

    29 3 Month RBANS vs. 3 Month MPAI-4 Cohort 3 – Active RBANS Responder PA (RBANS) For personal use only 115 110 105 RBANS 3 Month 100 95 90 85 80 75 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 MPAI-4 3 Month Values

  30. Slide 30: PK/PD analysis: Conclusions

    30 PK/PD analysis: Conclusions For personal use only • There appears to be an association of GOS-E, MPAI-4 and RBANS with AUC and CBSS • The association with AUC is stronger for patients with greater severity at baseline (higher CBSS) • The association with CBSS is very strong • For RBANS responders

  31. Slide 31: Study conclusions from top-line results (1)

    31 Study conclusions from top-line results(1) For personal use only • NNZ-2566 has a favorable safety profile • Baseline severity as measured by CBSS was strongly associated with all primary outcomes • Significant imbalance in baseline severity between active and placebo in all cohorts • No evidence

  32. Slide 32: Study conclusions from top-line results (2)

    32 Study conclusions from top-line results(2) For personal use only • Overall mortality rate was lower than reported in comparable TBI clinical trials, but difference between drug and placebo was not significant • Evidence of improvement for drug versus placebo in RBANS for patients with CBSS above

  33. Slide 33: Next Steps

    33 Next Steps For personal use only • Responder analysis • Biomarker trajectory analysis as a component of PK/PD • Explore adjustment of the analysis for covariates not included in CBSS (e.g., location of lesion, focal vs diffuse injury, comorbidities) • Evaluate utility of secondary endpoints for f

  34. Slide 34: INTREPID Investigators

    INTREPID Investigators Principle Investigator Site Frank Lucente Charleston Area Medical Center James Ecklund Inova Fairfax For personal use only Paul Vespa UCLA - Westwood Ross Bullock University of Miami - Miller School of Medicine Javed Siddiqi Arrowhead Regional Medical Center David Okonkwo Univ

Neuren Pharmaceuticals — 6th Annual TBI Conference, Washington DC (May 2016) on 6ix