NorthWestern Energy Group, Inc. · NASDAQ:NWE

NorthWestern Energy — Ascend Analytics — Technical Presentation (June 2017)

71 slides from NorthWestern Energy's technical presentation, Jun 15, 2017

  1. Slide 1: PowerSimm for Applications of Resource Valuation

    PowerSimm for Applications of Resource Valuation Presented by: Sean Burrows, PhD Alankar Sharma/Kristina Wagner [email protected] 303.415.1400 June 15, 2017

  2. Slide 2: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 2 ascend analytics

  3. Slide 3: Key Questions Addressed

    Key Questions Addressed • Resource Requirement—Addressed in April ETAC 1) How does PowerSimm model the need for flexible generation? 2) How does PowerSimm model the need for capacity? • Resource Valuation—Today’s ETAC 1) How does PowerSimm validate inputs of market conditions for modeling? a) Foreca

  4. Slide 4: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 4 ascend analytics

  5. Slide 5: PowerSimm Compared to Other Solutions

    PowerSimm Compared to Other Solutions Capability Competitors Ascend Detailed sub hourly dispatch optimization Flexible requirements as function of renewables X Integrated ability to calculate peak resource (MW) X Simulated weather, load, renewables, price X Substantiate “meaningful uncertainty” X Ma

  6. Slide 6: Keys to Future Supply Portfolios

    Keys to Future Supply Portfolios • Need to manage cost uncertainty and not position uncertainty Recognize new exposure is to price volatility not cost of energy Declining prices limit exposure of average open positions Increased volatility in prices increase exposure to future cost uncertainty • Nee

  7. Slide 7: Resource Valuation: Objective Functions

    Resource Valuation: Objective Functions Min Expected Value of Total Cost E[NPV of Total Costs] = E ∗ ∗ 1 • Fixed Costs follow revenue requirements Depreciation, Amortization, Current Taxes, Deferred Taxes, Insurance, Property Taxes, On-going capital improvements, return on equity and debt • Variable

  8. Slide 8: Calculation of Loss of Load Probability

    Calculation of Loss of Load Probability Weather drives load and Simulated renewables Simulated generation renewable generation generation & load outages Hydro Gen + = Capability to serve peak load Simulated Weather Renewables Generation outages PowerSimm captures the Note: Competing models to PowerS

  9. Slide 9: Resource Adequacy

    Resource Adequacy PowerSimm’s simulation framework captures the structural relation of weather with renewables and load over a wide range of future conditions MW Short @ 0% Reserve Margin 120 100 80 MW Short 60 40 20 0 60 Hours Short by Year Hours (Load > Capacity) 50 MEAN 40 P5 30 P95 20 10 0 9 asc

  10. Slide 10: Minutely Dispatch and Regulation

    Minutely Dispatch and Regulation 2020 Baseline + 200 MW Wind + 100 MW Solar • Solar 1 MW ~ 0.2 MW flexible resources • Wind 1 MW ~ 0.6 MW of flexible resources • Changes in gradient of net load • Base load 3 ∆’s in gradient • Net load 7 ∆’s in gradient 10 ascend analytics

  11. Slide 11: Total Flexibility Requirements in NWE – Minimizing Fast Ramp

    Total Flexibility Requirements in NWE – Minimizing Fast Ramp Flexible requirement = 15 minute ramp (Inc) + 1 minute ramp (Regulation) Illustration of Flexible Capacity Requirement Regulation Flexible Year Scenario Inc Capacity Capacity Requirements 2016 Base 168 28 196 2017 Base 169 28 197 2018 Base

  12. Slide 12: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 12 ascend analytics

  13. Slide 13: Implications of Weather During Delivery Conditions

    Implications of Weather During Delivery Conditions 13 ascend analytics

  14. Slide 14: Simulation Engine: Integrating Physical and Financial Uncertainty

    Simulation Engine: Integrating Physical and Financial Uncertainty Ascend’s PowerSimm is able to capture meaningful uncertainty, through: The flow chart • Producing realistic simulations of physical system and market conditions outlines • Capturing the core structural relationship between weather, lo

  15. Slide 15: PowerSimm Mirrors NWE's Weather-Load Relationship

    PowerSimm Mirrors NWE’s Weather-Load Relationship Weather is a key driver during delivery conditions Space cooling rapidly drives up energy usage Space heating drives a slower load response 15 ascend analytics

  16. Slide 16: PowerSimm Simulates Realistic Price-Load Relationships

    PowerSimm Simulates Realistic Price-Load Relationships • Red plus signs are historical data • Blue circles are simulated data • A high degree of overlap shows the model is effectively capturing the underlying dynamics 16 ascend analytics

  17. Slide 17: Renewables vs Temperature

    Renewables vs Temperature Solar Generation (MWh) Wind generation has a structural relationship with temperature differences but is weakly correlated with average temperatures Wind Generation (MWh) Average Temp F Solar generation exhibits an upward trend as temperature increases Average Temp F 17 asc

  18. Slide 18: Seasonal Energy Production of NorthWestern Hydros

    Seasonal Energy Production of NorthWestern Hydros Generation peaks with spring snow melt in April & May Generation MWh Hydro assets are largely run-of-river, but have pondage to provide capacity and some flexible generation 18 ascend analytics

  19. Slide 19: Fundamental Determinants of Volatility in Power Prices

    Fundamental Determinants of Volatility in Power Prices 19 ascend analytics

  20. Slide 20: Market Potential for Capacity: Energy Flows throughout the WECC

    Market Potential for Capacity Energy Flows throughout the WECC • PowerSimm performs fundamental modeling of the WECC region inclusive of transmission congestion and losses determined through an integrated generation dispatch and DC optimal power flow model. • Major interties support seasonal flow of

  21. Slide 21: Price Volatility in CAISO over time

    Price Volatility in CAISO over time 22% 7% • Peaks and Valleys in Renewables (as % of load) correspond to peaks & valleys in pricing volatility. 60% 42% • Increase in wind/solarincrease volatility in LMPs. 100% 50% 21 ascend analytics

  22. Slide 22: Over-generation due to increasing renewables is already here

    Over-generation due to increasing renewables is already here EIM Real Time Price Map. March 27, 2017 at 11:00 AM • kkkk Energy Imbalance Market in the Northwest 22 ascend analytics

  23. Slide 23: California needs to export excess solar to the WECC immediately

    California needs to export excess solar to the WECC immediately • CA is ahead of expectations in terms of renewable export due to 5 GW of rooftop solar plus utility scale solar. • March 2017 – 80 GWh of renewables were curtailed due to over-supply. • The Western Energy Imbalance Market is expected t

  24. Slide 24: Changing Market Dynamics as a Function of Renewables

    Changing Market Dynamics as a Function of Renewables Hour 24 ascend analytics

  25. Slide 25: Observed and Forecasted Increases in Price Volatility through Time WECC

    Observed and Forecasted Increases in Price Volatility through Time WECC 10% 7% Mid-C Volatility of DA LMP 25% 11% 25 ascend analytics

  26. Slide 26: WECC Market Analysis: Renewables and Market Volatility

    WECC Market Analysis: Renewables and Market Volatility Recorded Forecast Recorded Forecast • Market price volatility is expected to increase as renewable generation increases • Greater premium on highly flexible capacity • By 2027 the growth in price volatility diminishes • Volatility peaks during t

  27. Slide 27: Forward Prices and Volatilities

    Forward Prices and Volatilities 27 ascend analytics

  28. Slide 28: Forward Fuel Prices

    Forward Fuel Prices Prices peak in winter months (January) Source: Canadian Gas Price Reporter 28 ascend analytics

  29. Slide 29: Long-term Implied Heat Rates (Annual)

    Long-term Implied Heat Rates (Annual) Implied Heat Rates - Annual 14 Market quotes for forwards till 2020; 12 liquid forward curves post-2020 10 Implied Heat Rate (MMBTU/MWh) 8 6 4 2 0 Heavy Load HRs Light Load HRs • With the increasing penetration of zero variable cost renewable generation in WECC,

  30. Slide 30: Long-term Implied Heat Rates (Monthly)

    Long-term Implied Heat Rates (Monthly) Implied HRs - Monthly Late summer (August-September) peaks in implied heat rates slowly decline 18 over time due to increasing solar and wind generation. By 2025, with market maturity, the peaks in late summer and late winter (February) normalize to 16 the same

  31. Slide 31: Forward Price Volatility Inputs

    Forward Price Volatility Inputs Forward Price Volatility Inputs • Forward price 50% volatilities are used to accurately model 45% correlations between 40% monthly gas and power prices 35% Forward Volatilities 30% • Monthly forward volatilities are higher 25% closer to delivery 20% date of the forwar

  32. Slide 32: Spot Price Volatility Inputs

    Spot Price Volatility Inputs • Spot price volatilities account for increasing variability in intra-month power prices • Spot price volatilities for power are calculated as = (Standard Deviation of prices / Mean of prices) on monthly time steps • Volatility forecasts are developed based on relationsh

  33. Slide 33: Demonstrate PowerSimm UI – Forward Curve Editor, Spot Price Editor

    Demonstrate PowerSimm UI – Forward Curve Editor, Forward Curve Constraints Editor (Corr, Vol), Spot Price Editor 33 ascend analytics

  34. Slide 34: Raw Spot Price Simulations

    Raw Spot Price Simulations • Raw spot price data shows simulations consistent with market dynamics • Higher spot volatilities signified by increasingly larger price fluctuations in the future • Frequency of prices being >$100 increase over time consistent with observations in WECC region • Negative

  35. Slide 35: Long-Run Equilibrium Evolution to High Renewable Penetration Rates

    Long-Run Equilibrium Evolution to High Renewable Penetration Rates 35 ascend analytics

  36. Slide 36: New Thermal Units – Capacity Factors

    New Thermal Units – Capacity Factors • With decreasing power price forward marks, the monthly capacity factors for each generation type decreases. • CCs suffer marginally more than ICEs with more volatile power prices and incurred startup costs Thermal Assets - Capacity Factors 100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

  37. Slide 37: Long-run Equilibrium: Thermal Generation

    Long-run Equilibrium: Thermal Generation • Planning traditionally assumes long-run equilibrium conditions are satisfied through wholesale price conditions supporting new unit entry of a CC or CT. • Due to the lowering of implied heat rates and increasing volatility caused by renewables, Montana’s ma

  38. Slide 38: ColStrip – Capacity Factors

    ColStrip – Capacity Factors • ColStrip without must run component shows declining capacity factors with longterm price conditions • If modeled as must run, the must run component incurs annual losses owing to power prices being unfavorable (negative power prices) to keep the unit on ColStrip Capacit

  39. Slide 39: ColStrip – Net Revenue Returns ($/kW year)

    ColStrip – Net Revenue Returns ($/kW year) • With cheap coal prices, ColStrip plants will continue to generate revenues with increasing volatile prices • Revenues gained from higher positive prices will be greater than losses incurred from operating during negative price hours due to inflexibility •

  40. Slide 40: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 40 ascend analytics

  41. Slide 41: Forward Price Simulations

    Forward Price Simulations • PowerSimm simulates monthly forward curves for power for both on-peak (heavy) and off-peak (light) periods • PowerSimm simulations closely represent volatility conditions with higher price spreads closer to today’s transaction date and lower spreads further out For peak p

  42. Slide 42: Forward Price Simulations

    Forward Price Simulations Figures represent 5 simulated forward curve price paths for Heavy and Light load hours 42 ascend analytics

  43. Slide 43: Load Validation

    Load Validation Load Simulation Validation Results • Demonstrate a robust model to simulate future load • Capture uncertainty in load growth with extreme weather scenarios validated prior to a load simulation • Validated monthly load values • Validated hourly load values for hours 1-24 Load Simulati

  44. Slide 44: Temperature Validation

    Temperature Validation PowerSimm simulates temperature at multiple sites BILLINGS MISSOULA PowerSimm simulates temperature at multiple sites 44 ascend analytics

  45. Slide 45: Weather Simulations: WECC Regional Weather

    Weather Simulations: WECC Regional Weather • In addition to simulating Northwestern’s weather driven customer load, PowerSimm also simulates weather and load conditions for WECC region • The structural relationship between WECC weather patterns and historical prices drive simulations of future price

  46. Slide 46: Demonstrate PowerSimm UI – Main Market Model (WECC System Load)

    Demonstrate PowerSimm UI – Main Market Model (WECC System Load) 46 ascend analytics

  47. Slide 47: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 47 ascend analytics

  48. Slide 48: NWE System Optimization

    NWE System Optimization Objective Function – Minimizing the cost to meet load min #0 − ( + 3$ ∗ .# + >- + ./ ?5 456578 97: System Level Constraints • Meet load: • #0 − ( + ∑456578 97: 3$ = Availability for energy and regulation • Maximum and minimum generation levels • Maintain sufficient flexibilit

  49. Slide 49: Summary of Technologies and Valuation Approach

    Summary of Technologies and Valuation Approach Technology Valuation Summary Standalone battery storage Batteries generate system capacity value when they free up thermal resources from the task of regulation. Combined cycle units can therefore move from the mid-point to operating at full capacity wi

  50. Slide 50: Economics of Batteries

    Economics of Batteries 50 ascend analytics

  51. Slide 51: Three Uses of Batteries

    Three Uses of Batteries Three Uses of Batteries Regulation Balancing out minute-to-minute fluctuations in load and generation Ramping Respond to sub-hourly and hourly ramps (e.g. evening ramp as solar generation tails off) Load shifting Store excess generation that would otherwise be dump energy and

  52. Slide 52: Battery Benefits: Avoided Costs

    Battery Benefits: Avoided Costs Battery benefits consist of two key components: 1.) The avoided fuel cost from batteries providing regulation services • Thermal units have a declining heat rate (i.e. operate more efficiently) as they run closer to full load capacity. When thermal units serve regulat

  53. Slide 53: Battery Benefits: Capacity Value

    Battery Benefits: Capacity Value 2.) Batteries create capacity by relieving thermal plants of regulation responsibilities and allowing them to instead commit energy during peak load conditions Capacity Value vs Battery Size Capacity value of the 10, 25, 50 and 100 MW ESS over time. 160 140 120 100 M

  54. Slide 54: Production (Fuel) Cost Savings from Batteries

    Production (Fuel) Cost Savings from Batteries • The value of the batteries is measured as the difference in net revenue with and without batteries. • Batteries primarily derive value from furnishing regulation, enabling thermal generation to operate more efficiently. Production Cost Savings vs. Batt

  55. Slide 55: Economics of Energy-serving Batteries

    Economics of Energy-serving Batteries Annual Battery Revenues $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $ per MWh $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Small Battery (300 MWh) Medium Battery (1000 MWh) Large Battery (5000 MWh) • In an economic dispatch scenario, batteries serving

  56. Slide 56: Battery Charge and Discharge Relative to Power Price

    Battery Charge and Discharge Relative to Power Price Medium Battery (1000 MWh) - Market Price vs Battery Net Position for Oct 22 and Oct 23 50 As price $40 spikes, battery $35 Battery Charge/Discharge (MWh) 30 discharges MID-C market Price ($) $30 10 $25 $20 -10 $15 As price Battery doesn’t cycle dr

  57. Slide 57: Medium Battery State of Charge and Resource Interaction

    Medium Battery (1000 MWh) State of Charge for Oct 22 and Oct 23 600 $40 $35 500 MID-C Market Price $30 400 $25 MWh 300 $20 Battery charges between $15 200 2:00am and 6:00am $10 100 $5 0 $0 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 Hour Battery State of Charge (MWh) MID-C Price Medium Battery (1000

  58. Slide 58: Demonstrate Hourly Reports for Batteries

    Demonstrate Hourly Reports for Batteries (scrollbar charts) 58 ascend analytics

  59. Slide 59: Example Valuation Strategies by Technology

    Example Valuation Strategies by Technology 59 ascend analytics

  60. Slide 60: Stand-Alone Battery

    Stand-Alone Battery Provides capacity and more efficient energy to the system by substituting for conventional power plants in providing for ancillary services The conventional power plants no longer have to back down from their most efficient operating point to hold capacity in reserve for flexibil

  61. Slide 61: Pumped Hydro Storage

    Pumped Hydro Storage Co-optimized operation between energy and ancillary services and provide capacity. Economics driven by the spread between low and high prices throughout the day. Perform some Hydro Net Position Discharge in morning regulation all day and evening ramps 100 80 60 40 20 MW 0 -20 -4

  62. Slide 62: Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)

    Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Co-optimized operation between energy and ancillary services Net Position 100 MW plant does 100 50 MW of regulation 90 and 50 MW of energy 80 70 60 MW 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minutely Time-Scale Constraints for optimization: Ramp rate limit: 3$ − 3$ A ≤ !&! Power within cap

  63. Slide 63: Agenda

    Agenda Defining Model Objectives for Resource Evaluation Principal Model Drivers for Asset Valuation Validation Results Evaluation of Flexible Generation Technologies PowerSimm Configurations & Operations 63 ascend analytics

  64. Slide 64: Ancillary Services Modeled

    Ancillary Services Modeled Ancillary services modeled are specific to Northwestern Energy region; not tied to NERC standards Contingency Reserves: Resources that address outages of major units Spinning Online resources that can quickly address major outages; must respond within requirements 10 minut

  65. Slide 65: Demonstrate PowerSimm UI - Portfolio, Generation, Ancillary Reserve Editor

    Demonstrate PowerSimm UI - Portfolio, Generation (allowed ancillary contributions tab), Ancillary Reserve Editor, etc. 65 ascend analytics

  66. Slide 66: Unit Behavior – Base Portfolio - Basin Creek and ColStrip

    Unit Behavior – Base Portfolio - Basin Creek and ColStrip • Basin Creek CT unit primarily • ColStrip’s upper section (dispatchable, non-must-run) acts serves Non Spin and INC as a flexible generation resource serving regulation requirements services and spin, non spin as required • Must run portion

  67. Slide 67: Unit Behavior – Base Portfolio - David Gates

    Unit Behavior – Base Portfolio - David Gates • David Gates - fast ramping resource but expensive to run with high operating cost • With 6 total units modeled under David Gates plant, it can provide all types of ancillary services primarily providing regulation owing to high flexible capabilities 67

  68. Slide 68: Unit Behavior – Generic ICE Portfolio – ICE vs David Gates

    Unit Behavior – Generic ICE Portfolio – ICE vs David Gates • New ICE units are cheaper to operate compared to existing flexible David Gates unit • A new ICE introduced in NWE’s portfolio takes over providing regulation and freeing David gates to be available for Non Spin and INC incidences because i

  69. Slide 69: Unit Behavior – Generic Battery Portfolio – Regulation Serving Battery

    Unit Behavior – Generic Battery Portfolio – Regulation Serving Battery • Regulation serving batteries primarily serve flexible ramp requirements i.e. regulation • Batteries are cheaper to operate compared to thermal assets and are “always ON” causing batteries to primarily serve regulation requireme

  70. Slide 70: Unit Behavior – Hydros

    Unit Behavior – Hydros • Hydro units are modeled as energy only components and ancillary only components • Energy only hydro components are modeled on weather driven generation levels • Ancillary serving Hydro components are modeled as battery storage items providing corresponding ancillary service

  71. Slide 71: Demonstrate Hourly Cube Reports for Ancillary Contributions

    Demonstrate Hourly Cube Reports for Ancillary Contributions 71 ascend analytics

Ascend Analytics — Technical Presentation (June 2017) on 6ix