Axtec Limited · ASX:AXI

Axtec — Axiom Properties — Technical Presentation (August 2003)

32 slides from Axtec's technical presentation, Aug 27, 2003

  1. Slide 1: Port Geographe Presentation to Shire of Busselton

    Port Geographe Presentation to Shire of Busselton on 27 August 03 by Mick Rogers Principal Coastal Engineer M P Rogers & Associates Pty Ltd M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 1 Coastal & Port Engineers

  2. Slide 2: East Busselton Coast: Port Geographe & Wonnerup

    East Busselton Coast Port Geographe & Wonnerup ¾ Studies & Experience with Coastal Processes at East Busselton 9 History of erosion – Guerin Street Groyne built to protect area to west 9 Guerin Street Groyne caused significant erosion to east including Wonnerup Beach 9 About 50,000 m3/yr of sand mix

  3. Slide 3: Accretion and erosion caused by Guerin Street Groyne

    Accretion caused by Guerin Street Groyne Erosion caused by Port Geographe Guerin Street Site Groyne M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 3 Coastal & Port Engineers

  4. Slide 4: Fundamentals of Sediment Movement

    Fundamentals of Sediment Movement M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 4 Coastal & Port Engineers

  5. Slide 5: Fundamentals of Sediment Movement

    Fundamentals of Sediment Movement ¾ During the action of wave breaking, the sand is stirred up and put into suspension ¾ The wind, tidal and currents caused by waves breaking at an angle to beach move the sand along the beach – most of the movement is in the wave breaking zone ¾ The magnitude and di

  6. Slide 6: Fundamentals of Sediment Movement

    Fundamentals of Sediment Movement ¾ Breakwaters and dredged channels interrupt this movement along the beach ¾ There is accumulation on to the west (updrift side) and erosion to the east (downdrift side) ¾ There is also accumulation in the dredged channel causing the channel to shoal and this can ef

  7. Slide 7: Sand movement diagram: erosion and accretion

    50,000 m3/yr Erosion Accretion 50,000 m3/yr M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 7 Coastal & Port Engineers

  8. Slide 8: Seagrass Wrack Dynamics

    Seagrass Wrack Dynamics ¾ Seagrass plants loose some of their leaves each winter due to biological response and the increased hydrodynamic forces from winter storms and swells ¾ The seagrass wrack can be close to neutrally buoyant and float in the surface layer of the ocean ¾ The surface layer of th

  9. Slide 9: Seagrass wrack floating and easily moved by currents

    Seagrass wrack floating and easily moved by currents M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 9 Coastal & Port Engineers

  10. Slide 10: Seagrass Wrack Dynamics

    Seagrass Wrack Dynamics ¾ Simple estimates indicate that about 300,000 m3 of seagrass wrack can form on the beaches ¾ This is a natural process and occurred prior to the construction of Port Geographe ¾ The change in wind, wave and water level conditions in late spring and summer can clear some of t

  11. Slide 11: M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES Coastal & Port Engineers

    M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 11 Coastal & Port Engineers

  12. Slide 12: Port Geographe

    Port Geographe ¾ Initial plan by Kinhill Riedel & Byrne was to excavate a very large trap area every few years ¾ This was tried in 1998 and filled very quickly with seagrass wrack ¾ Some of this wrack has been covered by sand ¾ This approach failed because the trap filled with seagrass wrack rather

  13. Slide 13: Aerial Photograph May 1998: Large Trap Dredged

    Aerial Photograph May 1998 Large Trap Dredged M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 13 Coastal & Port Engineers

  14. Slide 14: Aerial Photograph December 1998

    Aerial Photograph December 1998 Trap filled with seagrass wrack & sand M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 14 Coastal & Port Engineers

  15. Slide 15: Seagrass wrack being covered by sand in 1998

    Seagrass wrack being covered by sand in 1998 M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 15 Coastal & Port Engineers

  16. Slide 16: Aerial Photograph April 2001

    Aerial Photograph April 2001 Note dredge working in trap area M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 16 Coastal & Port Engineers

  17. Slide 17: August 2003 photograph of trap area

    August 2003 photograph of trap area M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 17 Coastal & Port Engineers

  18. Slide 18: August 2003 photograph of trap area

    August 2003 photograph of trap area M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 18 Coastal & Port Engineers

  19. Slide 19: Port Geographe

    Port Geographe ¾ Beach monitoring has been completed over the years since Port Geographe was constructed ¾ Despite the bypassing completed, sand and seagrass wrack has accumulated to the west of the breakwaters ¾ There is a need to bypass larger quantities of material (a sand and seagrass wrack mixt

  20. Slide 20: Key Issues Regarding Bypassing

    Port Geographe Key Issues Regarding Bypassing ¾ There is limited equipment available capable of handling the sand / seagrass mixture ¾ The suitable equipment has limitations on the sea conditions in which it can safely operate ¾ The seagrass wrack does tend to clear from the west during late spring

  21. Slide 21: Consultative Committee

    Port Geographe Consultative Committee ¾ A Consultative Committee has been formed in accordance with the project approvals from the State Government and the Shire of Busselton ¾ There are members on this committee from the 9 Shire of Busselton 9 Department for Planning & Infrastructure 9 Department o

  22. Slide 22: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ Shire of Busselton requested that 100,000 m3 of material be bypassed in September and October 2003 ¾ Axiom advertised by public tender Australia wide – 17 sets of tender documents issued including several to contractors based in other states ¾ The tender

  23. Slide 23: Bypassing Objectives In Light of Tenders Received

    Bypassing Objectives In Light of Tenders Received ¾ Work with nature to minimise the amount of seagrass to be bypassed, ie start work in late September when nature has dispersed some of the seagrass wrack although late storms may return some wrack ¾ Bypass about 100,000 m3 of material as part of pro

  24. Slide 24: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ VMS Contractors have offered on a schedule rates basis to use land based equipment to bypass sand / seagrass wrack ¾ The offer is really a trial of equipment ¾ The equipment would include 9 Swamp dozer 9 Hydraulic excavator 9 Front end loader 9 3 or 4 Sem

  25. Slide 25: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ VMS can start in September ¾ Propose to proceed with trial and move about 60,000 m3 of material ¾ Pick up on beach to the east of Groyne Road and shape the beach to enhance the natural dispersion of the seagrass wrack ¾ Dispose material on eastern breakwa

  26. Slide 26: Aerial photograph: VMS extraction and disposal areas

    Aerial VMS disposal Photograph area April 2001 VMS extraction area M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 26 Coastal & Port Engineers

  27. Slide 27: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ Total Marine Services have tendered on a schedule of rates basis to use the dredge Sandpiper to bypass sand / seagrass wrack ¾ The offer is with proven equipment ¾ The equipment would include 9 Floating dredge 9 Crane 9 Booster pump 9 MDPE pipeline ¾ Equi

  28. Slide 28: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ Total Marine Services should be able to start in November ¾ Propose to move about 40,000 m3 of material ¾ Pick up on beach between Groyne Road and the marina entrance and in the marina entrance if needed ¾ Dispose material on eastern breakwater ¾ Cost abo

  29. Slide 29: Aerial photograph: Total Marine Services extraction areas

    Total Marine Aerial Services’ disposal Photograph area April 2001 Total Marine Services’ extraction areas M P ROGERS & ASSOCIATES 29 Coastal & Port Engineers

  30. Slide 30: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ Tender received from CGC Dredging offered floating dredge with significant qualifications concerning blockages and delays ¾ This dredge is unproven in this situation and may cost more than the other options ¾ Alternative equipment – Slurrytrak was also of

  31. Slide 31: Current Bypassing Proposals

    Port Geographe Current Bypassing Proposals ¾ Total cost of 2003/04 bypassing about $700,000 ¾ Work with nature as much as practicable ¾ Minimise impact on local community ¾ Trial new equipment and work methods ¾ Trial VMS using trucks on beach to move about 60,000 m3 of material in September to Xmas

  32. Slide 32: Likely Outcomes of Proposed Bypassing

    Port Geographe Likely Outcomes of Proposed Bypassing ¾ Operational experience on a range of equipment and methods for the long term management of the system ¾ Marina entrance maintained for small boat navigation ¾ Large amount of material placed on eastern beach to provide beach and protection ¾ Rem

Axiom Properties — Technical Presentation (August 2003) on 6ix